Laserfiche WebLink
Evergreen that precludes the proper construction and placement of the temporary cul-de-sac. The <br />City has placed a stop order on further construction of the townhomes at this location pending <br />resolution of the issue. Staff was proposing that they amend the Evergreen development <br />agreement to permit the Evergreen developer to construct a Class V, 16 foot wide street on the <br />154t~' Lane right of way within Sunflower Ridge to the west of Evergreen. The Council was <br />presented with the proposed agreement, which would require signatures from Edina <br />Development, Oakwood Land Development, Inc., and possibly US Homes, Inc. because they <br />have an option on the property. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich inquired if US Homes was willing to sign the agreement. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Public Works Olson explained that US Homes has an option to buy the <br />property, but the property owner is actually Oakwood Land Development and Oakwood has <br />si~,med the agreement. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich recommended that if the City Council approves the amendment that it be <br />subject to minor amendments made by the City Attorney and determining if US Homes would be <br />a party to the agreement. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig inquired if they would be talking about a 16-foot wide access road. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Public Works Olson explained that it would be a 16-foot gravel road to be <br />used for the snowplow drivers. Once the property owner is ready to develop the land they will <br />have to upgrade the road to City street standards. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak requested clarification as to who is involved with the agreement. <br /> <br />Assistant Director of Public Works Olson explained that Oakwood Land Development would <br />own the 16-fo0t roadway, but US Homes has an option on the property. Edina Development <br />owns the property where the easement for the temporary cul-de-sac was to occur. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak expressed concern that a developer has deviated from what is required in <br />the development agreement and there does not seem to be any real consequence for that. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied that the agreement does require Edina Development to submit an <br />escrow in the amount of $15,000 to the City to cover all the costs, which will include attorney <br />fees. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak stated that she wanted to make sure there was some penalty for breaking <br />the requirements established in the development agreement. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Pearson, to enter into the <br />Agreement regarding right of way relating to Evergreen Point Townhomes Second Addition, <br />which Agreement also authorizes amendment of said addition's Development Agreement dated <br />November 25, 2002, and authorize the Mayor and City Administrator to sign on behalf of the <br />City the necessary documents, subject to minor modifications made by the City Attorney and <br />potentially eliminating US Homes from the agreement if required. <br /> <br />City CounciFJanuary 13, 2004 <br /> Page 17 of 24 <br /> <br /> <br />