My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 11/12/2014
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2014
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 11/12/2014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:28:17 PM
Creation date
11/19/2014 11:46:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
11/12/2014
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
233
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
User Guide to The National Citizen SurveyT" <br />Demographic and Geographic Subgroup Comparison Reports <br />An additional service many participants in The NCS choose is comparison of results by respondent <br />characteristics. In the Demographic Subgroup Comparison Report, each survey question is cross - <br />classified by responses from different demographic groups in your community. We typically show five <br />demographic groupings (housing unit type, housing tenure, age, gender and race /ethnicity) so that you <br />can see if results differ depending on the demographic category of respondent. The Geographic <br />Subgroup Comparison Report is another optional service that compares survey responses by subgroups, <br />in this case, based on respondents' location (e.g., district, neighborhood, ward, etc.). In order to create a <br />report of geographic comparisons, the geographic subareas will need to be determined well before the <br />survey mailing. <br />In these subgroup comparison reports, we show the percent positive rating and shade "statistically <br />significant" differences grey. The shading is based on analysis of variance and chi - square tests of <br />statistical significance where a "p- value" of 0.05 or less indicates that there is less than a 5% probability <br />that differences observed among subgroups are due to chance; or in other words, a greater than 95% <br />probability that there are differences that exist in the subgroups being compared. <br />Table 1: Community Characteristics General <br />District 1 <br />I District 2 <br />1 District 3 1 <br />District 4 1 <br />overall <br />The overall quality of lire in ABC <br />53% <br />59% <br />% M <br />Si <br />57% <br />Housing <br />unit type <br />Housing tenure <br />11W% <br />Age <br />58:4. <br />Gender <br />Race /Ethniaty <br />72% <br />Percent rating <br />74% <br />68% <br />Your neighborhood asa place to live <br />45% <br />58% <br />50% <br />484% <br />50% <br />ABC as a place to raise children <br />White <br />Hispanic- <br />65% <br />positively (e.g., <br />63% <br />ABC as a place to retire <br />55% <br />65% <br />60% <br />65% <br />604. <br />overall appearance of ABC <br />50% <br />alone, not <br />and/or <br />59% <br />excellent/good) <br />Detached <br />Attached <br />Rent <br />Own <br />18 -34 <br />35 -54 <br />55+ <br />Fe male <br />Male <br />Hispanic <br />ether race <br />overall <br />The overall quality of <br />lire in ABC <br />5. <br />551 <br />53% <br />58% <br />55% <br />56% <br />5946 <br />50% <br />54 9 % <br />43% <br />56% <br />57% <br />Overall image or <br />_ <br />reputation of ABC <br />62% <br />55% <br />56% <br />59% <br />59% <br />56% <br />60% <br />56% <br />61% <br />58% <br />55% <br />58% <br />ABC as a place to live <br />68% <br />674b <br />644E <br />69% <br />6440 <br />69% <br />69% <br />58% <br />68% <br />68% <br />67% <br />68% <br />Your neighborhood as <br />a place to live <br />50% <br />49% <br />46% <br />51% <br />53% <br />49% <br />47% <br />50% <br />49% <br />49% <br />1 47% <br />50% <br />ABC as a place to raise <br />children <br />63% <br />62% <br />62% <br />63% <br />62 % <br />62% <br />65% <br />64% <br />6240 <br />62% <br />63% <br />ABC as a place to retire <br />60% <br />59% <br />57% <br />60% <br />60% <br />58% <br />61% <br />60% <br />58% <br />60% <br />60% <br />60% <br />Overall appearance of <br />ABC <br />55% <br />50% <br />43% <br />56% <br />50% <br />52% <br />57% <br />52% <br />53% <br />53% <br />Table 1: Community Characteristics General <br />Percent rating positively (e.g., excellent/good) <br />District 1 <br />I District 2 <br />1 District 3 1 <br />District 4 1 <br />overall <br />The overall quality of lire in ABC <br />53% <br />59% <br />% M <br />Si <br />57% <br />Overall image or reputation of ABC <br />50% <br />61% <br />11W% <br />58:4. <br />ABC as a place to live <br />60% <br />72% <br />72% <br />74% <br />68% <br />Your neighborhood asa place to live <br />45% <br />58% <br />50% <br />484% <br />50% <br />ABC as a place to raise children <br />57% <br />b6-lb <br />65% <br />67% <br />63% <br />ABC as a place to retire <br />55% <br />65% <br />60% <br />65% <br />604. <br />overall appearance of ABC <br />50% <br />52% <br />53% <br />59% <br />53% <br />Demographic subgroup comparisons can help with creating targeted communication and service <br />campaigns to address the concerns of each group. <br />Geographic subgroup comparisons can help demonstrate the sense of equity felt across the community <br />since residents in some parts of every community tend to feel better than do those in other areas about <br />the services they receive or the livability of their neighborhood. Results from geographic subgroup <br />comparisons will permit targeting of services, capital improvements and programs so that residents in <br />all areas can feel that they are receiving their fair share of resources. <br />15 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.