Laserfiche WebLink
Commissioner Van Scoy indicated he thought the standards in the Town Center would be a little <br />higher than elsewhere, and he does not see that here. <br /> <br /> Assistant C0ram~mty Development Director Trudgeon indicated the standards are not all <br /> exterior requirements. <br /> <br /> John Feges, Ppamsey Town Center, LLC indicated D.R. Horton has retained"ESG to work on this <br /> project, and t~ey are really concerned about keeping the elements in line with the urban fabric the .'' <br /> City is looki ',~ for in the Town Center. He stated they wiltprobablYSee many things you would : ' <br /> not see in 'o~er products, around the country. He notec~ that any suggestions the Planniag "~ <br /> Commission has ~ould be well received. ' <br /> <br /> Commissionel' Van Scoy indicated he is looking at;thedesign standards and wondering how it all <br /> fits. He noted this development does not meet the standards, butitlo0ks good. <br /> <br /> Mr. Feges stated there are many things besides color that they look at, such as shadows, lines, <br />etc. to make sure it does not look like just standard row-type housing. <br /> <br />Motion,. . by C0mmissioner:! : .. Brauer,. seconded, by Chairperson Nixt to recommend approval of the <br />preum~nary site plan sut~ject to compliance With the City Staff Review Letter dated January 30, <br />2004 and approval of the preliminary plat for R~m. Sey Town Center 2nd Addition. <br /> <br />Motion carrie{l. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nix~ Commissioners Brauer, Jeffrey, Shepherd, Van <br />Scoy and WatSon. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Johnson. <br /> <br />Case #9 , i~I.R~ew Architectural Standards for Medium and High Density Residential J ~Fi Districts <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Associate Pllmner~Geisler noted this is the second time they are bringin~ this to the Plannin <br />Comm,ss, on~.t";~S~.~ adv, sed as the C,ty continues to grow, the quality of new residential <br />de elopment wflt~lay an ~mportant ro!e in the duraNhty and d~versity of the City's housing <br />stock. She sla~ed:¢~e quality.of the City s housing stock has implications for property values and <br />the desir~bilitS, of theiarea:.t° prospective residents and businesses. She indicated the Planning <br />Commiss4iop-r~viewed the.draft standards at their December 4, 2003 meeting and recommended <br />the followiri~ ~:hanges~ <br /> it., [Reduce the brick requirement from 50% to 35% <br /> 2~: .Define pubhc thoroughfares as State Highways, County Highways, and MSA <br /> ( ~' a'oads · <br /> <br /> ~.~ :Proxfide an option for waiving the brick requirement if a proposed development <br /> ~ .exceeds the minimum standards of the Section. <br /> <br />Associate Pla ~nner Geisler indicated Staff would like the Planning Commission to recommend <br />changes to the Current draft, specifically: <br /> <br />Planning Commission/February 5, 2004 <br /> Page 13 of 18 <br /> <br /> <br />