Laserfiche WebLink
~ by Hendrlksen, Seconded by Thorud, Item 46, change the <br />words ~wlll/wll] not~ to "may be". DISCUSSION: Chairman Zlmmerman <br />thought the Attorney has stated the wording "may be" Is not <br />appropriate wordlng in Findings of Fact. Commissioner Hendrlksen <br />stated he was not in a position of knowing whether this will or <br />will not be unduly dangerous. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Hendriksen, Thorud; NO-Deemer, LaDue, <br />Zlmmerman; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motion failed. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, Item 46, "will not". <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Zimmerman; NO-Hendrlksen, <br />Thorud; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, Item 47, "will". <br />DISCUSSION: Commissioner Hendrlksen noted Item 23 of the Findings <br />of Fact states the Applicant's site plan Indicates the drives, <br />storage...are proposed to be gravel rather than hard surfaced tn <br />Area B which does not conform to City code. He didn't see any <br />significant improvement on the property, and he believed the <br />Comprehensive Plan ts to better the area and to expect the <br />ordinances to be followed. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Zlmmerman; NO-Hendrlksen, <br />Thorud; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, Item 48, "will" in the first <br />instance and °~wll] not" in the second instance. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Zimmerman; NO-Hendrlksen, <br />Thorud; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motlon carried. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, Item 49, "will not". <br />DISCUSSION: Commissioner Thorud didn't think they could determine <br />what the future neighboring houses are going to be, asking how he <br />would know whether it will be disturbing to them or not. <br />Commissioner Hendrlksen felt they have heard enough from existing <br />neighbors that the site is disturbing, and that can be pro3ected to <br />to mean that any new neighbors would also find It disturbing. <br />Commissioner Deemer did not recall any objections from the <br />testimony at the public hearing. It all had to do with the waste <br />management facility, which has been deleted from this permit. <br />Commissioner Thorud disagreed. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Zimmerman; NO-Hendriksen, <br />Thorud; ABSENT-Bawden, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />~OTION by Hendriksen, Seconded by Thorud, Item 50, that there <br />will not De a substantial improvement. DISCUSSION: <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission/December 6, lg90 <br /> Page 8 of I2 <br /> <br /> <br />