Laserfiche WebLink
MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, add Item 55, the Attorney's <br />memo of December 4. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Thorud, Zlmmerman; NO-None; <br />ABSENT: Bawden, Hen~rtksen, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, Item 56, include the May 30, <br />1990, letter from the Tiller Corporation that was submitted and <br />read by the Chairman. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Thorud, Zlmmerman; NO-None; <br />ABSENT: Bawden, Hendrlksen, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, to adopt the amended <br />Findings of Fact. DISCUSSION: It was noted the Findings to be <br />adopted are those of December 3, 1990, as amended this evening. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Zlmmerman; NO-Thorud; <br />ABSENT: Bawden, Hendrlksen, Terry° Motion carried. <br /> <br />The Commission then discussed the proposed condlttona] use permit. <br />Page 2 of the permit, Mr. Otto noted a ¢orrectlon under the Outline <br />of Mon'itorlng Program. It should read under "Parameter", <br />"Particulates, opacity, SOX". <br /> <br />On Page 3, Mr. Rychner stated Item 13 needs to be modified as he <br />will be using off spec waste oll tn hls furnaces. He then <br />explained that 80 percent of the waste ol] In the United States is <br />burned. He has an EPA permit to burn draln ol] at hls existing <br />site. His oi] Is taken from the site, and he has screened and <br />filtered oil brought to the site to be burned. He would prefer to <br />use methane gas; however, It is essential to have a backup when the <br />methane is not available. <br /> <br />MOTION by Deemer, Seconded by LaDue, to change Item 13 to read, <br />"...for the primary operation and tn no case allowed in the after <br />burner system. Methane gas will be used whenever it is available." <br />DISCUSSION: Commissioner Deemer noted the intent is the off spec <br />waste oil can be used as a backup, but not as the primary source of <br />operation. That coincides with what is found in the Findings of <br />Fact. <br /> <br />VOTE ON MOTION: YES-Deemer, LaDue, Thorud, Zimmerman~ NO-None; <br />ABSENT: Bawden, Hendrlksen, Terry. Motion carried. <br /> <br />Page 5, Item 23, Mr. Jankowski asked that the first sentence <br />include a phase that surface waters meet all applicable local and <br />water management organization watc~~ quality standards as we]] as <br />the state and federal ones. Then they wi]] have the flexibility of <br />applying standards that may be established by the City or the water <br />management organization to this permit. <br /> <br />Planning and Zoning Commission/December 6, 1990 <br /> Page 10 of i2 <br /> <br /> <br />