02/05/91 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Motion cam~:1. Voting Yes: and Terry. VOting No: None. Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners L',d2)ue, Bawden, Deemer Absent: Commissioners Hendriksen and Thorud. The Commission ~'ecessed at 9:18 p.m. Chairman zitmmerman called the regular meeting back to order at 9:40 p.m. Motion by C~tnmissioner Bawden and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to amend Item//27 of the Proposed Findings of Fact to indicate that the proposed use will substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment or market value of surrounding property. Motion carried, i Voting Yes: Commissioners LaDue, Bawden and Deemer. Voting No: Chairman Zi~merman and Commissioner Terry. Absent: Commissioners Hendriksen and Thorud. , Motion by COmmissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to delete Item//28 of the proposed Findings of Fact, as it was a repeat of Item #27. Motion carriad. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners LaDue, Bawden, Deemer and Terry. Vbting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Hendriksen and Thorud. Motion by COmmissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Bawden to amend Item #29 of the proposed[Findings of Fact to indicate that the proposed use will not be harmonious with the comprehensive plan. Further DisCt~ssion. Chairman Zimmerman questioned how the City could grant a conditional use permit for ~ iparticular use and then not allow an expansion of the same use. Commissioner Deemer stated, that facts have chan~ed since the original CUP was issued and the use as it exists now is not 'ill conformance with tl~e comprehensive plan. Commissioner Terry noted that the conditionaLu}e permit is referring to the use and not to the operation. Mr. Otto noted that in the original conOtion~al use permit, the findings indicated that the proposed use will be harmonious with the com}reh~nsive plan. Commissioner Deemer noted that when the original conditional use permit was ~nsi~ered, the City was not informed that Mr. Karst would be disassembling and storing buse~/ion ~tdjacent property. Mr. Otto noted that the proposed amended conditional use permit also d}es not include storage of buses; the storage of feed stock on adjacent property would be addressed~undCr a new condit~nal use permit and site plan. In the meantime, Lots 4/2 and #3 were not incl~dect in the original conditional use permit, therefore, Mr. Karst is in violation of the ordinance re~ardipg screening for uses that occur in an industrial zone. Mr. Karst stated that as he understands the situation, he has three options for Lots #2, 4/3 and #4: 1) apply to the City for a conditional ~se permit and site plan approval; 2) screen the buses; or 3) remove the buses. Commission,s D~eemer and Bawden withdrew their motion. Motion by commissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Ten3., to amend Item #29 of the proposed F~i~d~ngs of Fact to indicate that the proposed use will be harmonious with the comprehenSi'~e plan. Ix/lotion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Zimmerman, Commissioners LaDue, Bawden, Deemer and Terry. ~oting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Hendriksen and Thom& Motion by COmmissioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend Item #30 of the PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION/OCTOBER 16, 1990 Page 7 of 11