Laserfiche WebLink
th9 Investment Framework the draft suggests seven heading~ for <br />PO~ic~ consideration. Recommendation Number Four, Transition <br />kr~asl suggests that the Council "... need not restrict <br />communities from utilizing other tools, such as ghost <br />platting, to address the transition area." Approval of the <br />Fa~e Preliminary Plat with full knowledge that staged <br />deYel0pment would take place is consistent with the "ghost <br />platting,, concept and is a reasonable approach to the sDlit <br />MUSA line site of the preliminary plat. <br />W~TE WATER TREATMENT PLANT <br />It~is essential for the City to stage sewer connections and <br />the Faye development is expected to be improved over a period <br />time and within the sewer connection limitations. <br /> <br />SUMMARy,: <br /> <br />This paper responds to all five the Metropolitan Council comments <br />as cont&ined in the Chair letter of February, 1990 to Mr. Larry <br />Hartman~iofEQB. I believe that Faye Preliminary Plat is reasonable <br />for public support as the developer 1.) has given proper <br />consideration of existing trees and vegetation; 2.) .has resolved a <br />trail l~ca~ion with the City which is consistent with Critical Area <br />Corrido~ ~equirements, 3.) has proposed a development that is <br />consistgnt with present zoning and could be converted in the event <br />air ort~zonin is adopted, 4.) will develop propertiem within t~e <br /> P ~ ~ g .... <br />presentii M~JSA and future development will follow only when <br />encompa~sed by the future MUSA and 5.) will develOp as sewer <br />connections become available. <br /> <br />I trust~ t~at the above adequately responds to the Metropolitna <br />Council ~concerns and supplementes basis for EQB and City support. <br /> <br />Sincerely, <br /> <br />BBC:dmn- ~ <br /> <br />E~c. <br /> <br />cc: <br /> <br />RiOhard T. Thompson, Metropolitan Council <br />La~ryRartman, EQB <br />I%.an Schwartzman <br /> <br /> <br />