Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Otto i-i Re~lied that they would be allowed. <br />Joe Senty~z -!Inquired about property devaluation due to airport. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto i~', Reglied that established properties should not decrease in value <br />because ~/~ey are exempted from restrictions. <br />Joe SentYr~ -i Stated that improving the airport will attract more and <br />bigger afr~raft and air traffic will increase. <br /> <br />Mr. Harti-e~- -iStated that this question and answer period was intended for <br />clarificatiion of any portion of Mr. Otto's presentation. <br /> <br />Citizen ' tnq,~ired if proposed safety zones are etched in stone. <br />Mr. Otto ~! P~ied that approach surfaces are defined by FAR; although MN <br />DoT requ~ ~r~s land use safety zones to be 2200 feet in length (2/3 of runway <br />length) ~ B,~zones to be 1100 feet in length (1/3 of runway length), there <br />is room fdk a~justment. <br /> <br />citizen -! Inguired if Council will be adopting the ordinance unless <br />something ~raStic shows up. <br /> <br />Mr. Harttey -~Stated that there are certain properties proposed to be <br />aoquiredi~d .pther properties that have restrictions on them. It was <br />evident .~a.~ t just the subject of airport improvements and whether or not <br />their pr]io~erty would be acquired was presenting problems for people. <br />Council d.e~id~ that they had enough information and that it was time to <br />make an ~n~en~ion statement so people could make plans. Council has not <br />made up .~h~. lr ~m/nds as far as whether or not there is going to be a~rport <br />zoning a~dli wh~t will be in it. <br /> <br />Citizen ~ ~a~ed that his property is in Zone A and inquired as to what <br />would h~n i~f his home burned down and the zoning ordinance had been <br />adopted ~e~trl. cting him from rebuilding but a decision to proceed with the <br />airport ~ n~0t been made. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto i-i stated that the property owner would have the right to request <br />that the lofty ieither grant a variance to rebuild or acquire the property. <br />If the o~t~ d~_termined not to proceed with the airport project, they would <br />rescind ~h9 a~rport zoning ordinance and the property c~a~er in that type of <br />situatio~ ~ou~d have no problem. <br /> <br />Citizen . i~nqu/red if the ordinance that would be adopted be more detailed <br />than the d~af~ being discussed this evening, especially with respect to <br />what woul~i~¢r ~eate glare in pllots eyes. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto -iSt~ted that the draft ordinance being discussed is based on a <br />model ordi~n. 09 developed by the State. Generally, you would not see more <br />specific .V%,rb~ e. Unless there is a real specific problem apparent when a <br />building P~rmi~ is submitted, typical yard lights, etc. will not be in <br />viol atio~. <br /> <br />Airport Zoning Board/March 11, 1987 <br /> <br />Page 5 of 12 <br /> <br /> <br />