Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />3. The pre~ent zoning is Urban Residential and allo.~:_~ for 2-8 units/acre <br /> and ,Urban Business which allows for 5-15 units/acre. <br /> <br />4. Presently, this plan is not in conflict with the Ramsey Comprehensive <br /> Plan, as amended. <br /> <br />5. /he propOsed density of 6.6 units/acre is not in conflict with the <br /> Ramsey Comprehensive Plan, as amended. <br /> <br />6. The plan is designed to form a desirable and unified development <br /> withinits own boundaries. <br /> <br />7. The proposed uses will not be detrimental to present and future land <br /> uses l~ithe surrounding area. <br /> <br />8. Any~e~Ceptions to the standard requirements of the zoning and subdivision <br /> ord~nan~.~es are ~ustified by the design of the development. <br /> <br />9. Theipla~ will not create an excessive burden on parks, schools, streets <br /> an~oth~r public facilities and utilities which serve, or are proposed <br /> to Serve, the planned development. <br /> <br />10. The~pl~nned development will not have an undue and adverse impact on the <br /> reasonable enjoyment of neighboring property. <br /> <br />11. In ~u~e of 1977, public hearings were held showing proposed zoning and <br /> 4ev~lO~ent densities for this area. A density of 4.8 units/acre <br /> was!&p~roved in 1977 and What this PUD i~ proposing..is-~ot 'that great <br /> an tn~eue. <br /> <br />12. Sho~t .~erm and long term screening plans, between Flintwood I and <br /> pl~htwood II, will be required. <br /> <br />I 13. & i~rt~on of open space required was donated with the p~atting of <br /> <br /> 14. ~.~l~ar Paatikka's letter dated November 23, 1983 to the Planning and <br /> Zon/xtg~(l~mission dated Nove~er 23, 1983. <br /> <br /> 15. ~ adjoining properties to the west are residential dwellings located <br />I on&~oximately i acre sites with current assessing values ranging <br /> f~m $~7,000 to $80,000. <br /> <br />I It was afar%much ~Liscussion that-the entire Commission agreed with point %7 <br /> of the F~ngs of Fact. .Asa-result of this discussion, Mr. Carson stated <br /> that~ ~sv~oper-wou14be willing to reduce the number of quads fro~8 to 7 <br /> an~ trY~to~gainthat~ensity in Phase II. Mr. Carson state, that 7 quads <br />I the absolute lowest density the developer could offer. Plans for a tot <br /> was <br /> lot will also!be deleted. <br /> <br />It was also b~ ought out in discussions that Council has been referring to <br />Thurston AveDA/e as an MSA highway and it should be MSA street. <br /> <br />Mr. Ralph He rndrikson also requested that a green buffer be planted at this <br />time for ~ose, ¢~ercial lots so that by the time they are developed a <br />mature buffer will be in place. <br /> <br /> P & Z/Dece~b~r' <br /> <br />r' Page 5 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />