05/01/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I Mr. Sentyrz s~ated that Commission discussion indicated that the Co~...[~ission would cons~de~ a 4 parcel plat if the parcel size could be brought up to at least .92 ~cr~s and we are now presenting a plat with 4 paroels .938 acres in size. ~ro ISentyrz explained that he is attempting to keep lot sizes at a minimum so~ithe businessman can afford to o~erate in an industrial area rather than in a zesi~ential area, which is what he thought the City wanted. Chairman Pete~son reviewed P & Z minutes from March 6, 1984 and a motion was passed authorizing Mr. Sentyrz to go to the preliminary plat stage; Chairman Peterson .stated that the Commission will stand by their motion. I I I I I I I I I I ! I i I CommissiQn~r [:LaDue stated he would be willing to introduce a motion to recommend &pp~oval of the preliminary plat with 4 parcels, if and when Mr. Sentyrz complies W~th ithose requirements listed in the City Engineer's letter dated A~ril 2, 1984, Case #2: Sketch Plan A~proval; Case Of Mr. Arthur Raudio: City EngSneer ~Baatikka reviewed with the Commission his letter dated April 3, 1984 regar~in~ Ramsey Center Partnership Sketch Plan. Mr. Arthur RaUdio, Mr. ~/ck Foster and Mr. Lyle McLaughlin were present. Discussion en~ued regarding the number of cul-de-sacs included in the sketch plan and Mr. Berg stated the City would be responsible for maintaining these cu,-de-Sac after they are developed and the number of cul-de-sac included in this sketch plan is of concern to the City. Mr. Berg stated that Staff recommendS, fTom a maintenance and accessiblity standpoint, that all cul-de-sacs be elimi~ate~[ except the cul-de-sac on the River and on the North end and that a future =onnection be provided to Juniper Ridge Drive. DiscussiO~ ensued regarding an access to the park and that it should be a joint effOrt between the developer and the City. Mr. Foster pointed out that the plans indicate 66' wide streets. City Eng~neer[Raatikka stated that during recodification the City will most likely ~o to 66' streets. OommissionerDeemer noted that in order to be consistent development along the ~'-~ P/ver, a 4' bike lane will be required. Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman that the developer prqceed, bearing in mind those items discussed at tonight's meeting. Motion oaxried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Oommissioners Kennen, Deemer, Zimmerman, ~nd~iksen and LaDue. Voting No: None. Absent: Oommissioner Johnson. Case #3: ~rgP°s~ Extension of Magnesium St. N.W.; Case Of Mr. Bob Hoffman: Mr. Hoffman presented copies of a sketch plan for extending Magnesium St. N.W. Commissioner Zimmerman stated that a property owner to the north is requesting access. Mr. Hoff~n replied that he can have it. P & Z/A~ril 3, 1984