Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br /> <br />CommtBsio~er Hendriksen proposed the following as a finding of <br />fact: <br /> <br /> #9' N~ture of land upon which landfill is proposed is the <br /> ' l~ast desireable of possible soils based on report <br /> p~epared by Anoka County Soil and Water Conservation <br /> District. <br />The CO~mmiSsion continued to review Standards for Consideration. <br /> <br />b) Th~ n <br /> <br />c) <br /> <br />Commi <br />t'h o <br />inl cl <br />ofI~ pr <br /> <br />lture of the adjoining land or buildings. <br /> <br />ssioner Zimmerman stated that it has been learned at <br />une 25, 1984 public hearing that adjacent homes are <br />~se proximity to the landfill and there are reports <br />ivate well failure on adjoining properties. <br /> <br />The p~oximity of a similar use. <br /> <br />Chairman Peterson stated that the City is not aware of any <br />otheri permit for similar use in that proximity. <br /> <br />d) <br /> <br />e) <br /> <br />f) <br /> <br /> Commissioner Deemer stated that there does exist a clean <br /> fill isite in Ramsey within one mile of the current landfill. <br /> The ~ffect upon traffic into and from the premises, or on <br /> any ~djoining roads. <br /> <br /> M~. ~tter stated that Waste Management does not foresee any <br /> d~re~t increase in traffic other than the normal 5% annually <br /> ~e ~o volume increases. He also stated that collection <br /> vehicle capacity increases as a way to reduce number of trips <br /> into ithe landfill. <br /> <br /> The ~otal number of similar uses within the city. <br /> chai.~an Peterson stated this consideration as not appropriate <br /> in t~is case. <br /> <br /> Whet~er or not the use will be dangerous or otherwise <br /> d~tr.~mental to persons residing or working in the vicinity <br /> Of t~e use, or to the public welfare, and whether or not <br /> it W~ll substantially impair the use, enjoyment or value <br /> o~ a~y property. <br /> Commissioner Hendriksen stated that the only appraisor the <br /> C~mmtssion has heard is Mr. Bjorklund who was retained by <br /> wast~ Management and Mr. Bjorkiund indicated that there would <br /> be SSme devaluation. <br /> <br /> Comm~ssioner Deemer stated that his recollection of Mr. <br /> BJorklund's co~mments were that he could not measure detriment <br /> to a~jacent property value but that desirability of property <br /> was ~educed. <br /> C°mm~ssioner Hendriksen stated that he recollected Mr. <br /> ~B~Or~lund's comments as that if a number of conditions were <br /> m~t ~n the noise area, that reduction in value would be as <br />~ P & Z/July 3, 1984 <br />~:~ ~ Page 8 of 19 <br /> <br /> <br />