09/04/84 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Case #2 ~ ReI~uest To Subdivide By Metes And Bounds Lot 8, Block 4, ' T.~aprock Commonsi case Of Mr. David. Mauan: Mr. Hauan was present and requested authorization to subdivide Lot 8, Block 4, iTr~prock Commons into two lots; each lot would be slightly less than t~o acres in size and would front on 155th Avenue which is an MSA sflreet. The Commission reviewed the findings of fact. Motion by C~ to accept ?: ·,missioner LaDue and seconded by Commissioner Deemer ridings of Fact O0 regarding Mr. David Hauan's request to subdivide: Lot 8, Block 4, Traprock Commons into two lots and to add the ~!ollowing items to the findings of fact: Requests of this type, notably in Oakridge Estates, approxi- mately within the past year, were denied. The subdivision would create a need for access on 155th, an MSA ~oad. (Please refgr to Findings of Fact file for Findings of Fact 00 ). i. Motion c'arrled. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Deemer, Zi~merman, Hendriksen, LaDue and Johnson. Voting No: None. Absent: COmmissioner Kennen. Motion by Qommissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Zimmerman to recC"~m~ e~d disapproval of Mr, David Hauan's request to subdivide by metes a~d bounds Lot 8, Block 4, Traprock Commons. Motion'ear~ied. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Deemer, ~Ziz~merman, Hendriksen, LaDue and Johnson. Voting No: None. Absent: Cemmissioner Kennen. Case #3 ~orrection To Planning And Zoning Commission Meeting r. Minutes Dated 'Ju~'~ 'f5, 19'84: Per the C _o~mission's direction, the secretary did review her notes for any specific percentages mentioned by the appraisor, Mr. Bjorklund, at theJun~ 25, 1984 public hearing. In checking the minutes, Mrs. Frolik didI find the comment by Mr. Bjorklund in which he stated property v~lues adjacent to the landfill could be decreased by 5% or less be~cause of the landfill. Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Hendriksen authorizi~g that the June 25, 1984 meeting minutes be amended as follows: Page 7,~ last paragraph, 2nd sentence - Change to read: "If Waste Management does achieve this reduction in noise, Mr. BJorkl~nd believes there will be no significant reduction in proPer~y values; any reduction would be 5% or less." Motion ~carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Deemer, Zi, nmerman, Hendriksen, LaDue and Johnson. Voting No: None. i'Ab~ent: Commissioner Kennen. P & Z/August 7, 1984 Page 4 of 8