Agenda - Council - 09/22/1992 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I I Sharon WatCh,. representing Danny's Aluminum Processing, Inc., stated that Mr. Karst's proposal or gn at ~ended CUP and new site plan is to address issues raised earlier. Aesthetics is a big issue anfl'~the' oal is to put as much as possible into the building. The new building would be 13,000 feet.i ~e i~proposing to construct more effective screening such as a 10 foot fence made of metal or wood. S§e added they have attempted to address the environmental issues. In the present building, ther~ is it floor 6rain for waste oil and there is one proposed for the new building also. The srn~0ke j'e~°n4were made out of ignorance; when material is taken out of the furnace it is hot, therefore, ~ke ~t~ises from the material. Twin City Testing has done tests on the smoke stacks and there islnb:pr0blem with the emissions. Application has been made to the Pollution Control Agency rell~din~ the initial afterburner; however, PCA has had a turnover in staff and the application ~hgs b~en misplaced. One of their staff is now walking the process through for the permit and On~c,e t~at is processed, an afterburner will be put on the second unit. Mr. Karst disseminated a question and answer sheet that addressed issues raised about his business. Following di~uss3)on of these issues, Commissioner Deemer inquired if there were any violations to Mr. Karst'sl present conditional use permit. Mr. Karst sta~d tfiere were and explained the confusion. He understood that what his competition was allowed:R) dt~, he also was allowed to do. If that were the case, he would not be in violation of his CUP; Commis~;ion~r De~mer felt that as long as Mr. Karst had violated his existing CUP, he didn't want to consider recommending an amended one. Motion by .Cvmr~.'ssioner Deemer to table this case until Mr. Karst is in compliance with his existing CLIP, Motion diM for lack of a second. The CommisSion ~roceeded to review the findings of fac~. Motion by C~mr~issioner Deemer and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #12 to read "That the Al:~plic~t has submitted revised documentation dated August 26, 1992, drawn by Hakans°n Arlclers~n Associates, Inc. consisting of a four (4) sheet set including boundary s, urvey, site plan, gr~ 'ing ~plan, landscape plan, and a two (2) sheet set of architectural drawings... Motion car4ried. ~oting Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commissioner Deemer, Terry, Holland, LaDue and Thom& Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. Motion by Cgmrrgi, ssioner Terry and seconded by Commissioner Deemer to add a finding to read "The City ofgam~ey has defined that when a site receives discarded materials and processes these materials intollan 4nd product with value, then it's considered manufac~ng. When a site receives discarded materials for collection and recycles them at another site, it s considered a solid waste management faeili~". Morion carrie, ~/onng Yes: Chairperson Bawden, Commfssioners Ten-y, Deemer, Holland, La.Due and Ti~om4t. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Hendriksen. ~onon by Cgmm)-ssioner Holland and seconded by Commissioner Terry to amend #26 to read ~hat the pr0gose4l use will not substantially adversely impair the use, enjoyment or market value of any sun'Ou!~ding property . P~lanning and Zoning Commission/September 1, 1992 Page 5 of 10