Laserfiche WebLink
CRITERIA FOR EVALUATION OF PROPOSALS <br /> <br />The following criteria will be used 1or proposal evaluation. <br /> <br />SAL$ RECOMMENDED FROM ALL FUNDING SOURCES: Project Managers must be <br />able to complete project objectives.. <br /> <br />ty will be given to proposals that best meet the following criteria~ The total potential <br />each criterion is written in parentheses. <br /> <br /> el ~iGNFiCANCE. Addresses significant environmental or natural resource issues, (9) <br /> L <br />I · ~NDI !RLYING CAUSES - Addresses underlying causes, stresses prevention of <br /> : i : .mvironmental degradation and emphas~es wise stewardship. (9) <br /> · :~EGI; ILATIVE ANALYSIS - Addresses needs identified through .other legislative initiatives. (9) <br /> ·' ~P.,v~GING- Leverages funding (nonstate). (9) <br /> <br />i · <br /> ~OO~DINATION- Demonstrates a coordinated, multidisciplina~y approach. (7) <br /> ,· H° TDURATION- One biennium.(7) .. <br /> <br /> e:~n~/.,.N_~.ATION ~ Innovative approach. (7). . · <br /> · I~IFO~RMATION BASE, Provides a significant useful addition to the information base. <br /> (s) <br /> <br /> · - i~CCP,.LERATION - Accelerates natural resource programs, does not Supplant existing <br /> !! !unding. (5) <br /> <br /> · :. WIDE SIGNIFICANCE - (5) <br /> <br />iC. In addit~n, ~rust Funcl expenditures must conform to the Trust Fund law (M.S: 116P.08). <br /> <br /> <br />