Laserfiche WebLink
8 x pts. <br /> <br />PARK C.I.P. SCORING CRITERIA <br /> Points 0- 10 <br /> <br />Population served by the recreational resource or the need created by the population <br />for recreation. Points allocated would be in relation to City-wide needs. <br />0 points, e.g.: little recreation needed <br />10 points, e.g.: the most dire recreational deficit in relation to population <br /> <br />7 x pts. <br /> <br />Existing Develonment <br /> <br />Points 0- 10 <br /> <br />Recreation availability within the district <br />0 points, e.g.: existing development or opportunities adequate in relation to other <br />park districts <br />10 points, e.g.: little or no development or recreation within the district. <br /> <br />6 x pts. <br /> <br />Distaqce to Similar Component <br /> <br />Points 0- 10 <br /> <br />The distance to access a similar park or recreational activity. This may be without <br />regard to artificial district or entity boundary lines. <br />0 points, e.g.: similar park experience within a reasonable distance <br />10 points, e.g.: no similar components within a reasonable distance. <br /> <br />5 x pts. <br /> <br />Imnact on City <br /> <br />Points 0 - 10 <br /> <br />Represents impact on Ramsey's image <br />0 points, e.g.: a reduction in future City's options <br />10 points, e.g.: a positive influence on economic growth <br /> <br />4 x pts. <br /> <br />l[moact on System Points 0-10 <br /> <br />The value of improvements to City-wide diversity as it relates to recreation <br />0 points, e.g.: common place component <br />10 points, e.g. a recreation component that is nonexistent in Ramsey. <br /> <br />3 x pts. <br /> <br />Operational Impact <br /> <br />Points 0- 10 <br /> <br />The cost of annual maintenance or the likelihood that replacement or substantial <br />maintenance expenses will be incurred within a brief time frame. <br />0 points, e.g.: an improvement such as a ball field with many different maintenance <br />costs and components. Lighting of recreational fields may also receive a lower <br />rating because of utility costs. <br />10 points e.g.: paved parking lots require less attention than gravel and do not <br />require safety inspections etc. and therefore may receive a higher rating. <br /> <br />2 x pts. <br /> <br />Points 0- 10 <br /> <br />Has educational possibilities without formal instruction. This could be by virtue of <br />exposure to the natural world or for instance instructional plantings or signage. <br />0 points, e.g.: no recognized significance <br />10 points, e.g.: significant learning possibilities. <br /> <br />1 xpt. <br /> <br />Expansion Capabilities <br /> <br />Points 0- 10 <br /> <br />References not only physical expansion of a park itself but, more importantly, <br />measures the likelihood that more residents may benefit in the future. <br />0 points, e.g.: a subdivision "filled" and trail connection unlikely <br />10 points, e.g. The park may increase in stature, trail connection possible, higher <br />future density affecting park likely. <br /> <br /> <br />