12/01/92 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Frolik Frolik Frolik 1 1/05/92 1 1/05/92 1 1/05/92 Re: Dalles R.V. Conditions of the Conditional Use Permit The P&Z Commission voted to reduce the vehicle display area in the front to two spaces. - Commissioner Hendriksen voted no. #2: Reduce the amount of vehicles to 31 and Delete "No vehicles shall be displayed along the west side of driveway and replace it with no vehicles shall be displayed closer than 40 feet to the front property line. #6: The Permittee shall be responsible for installing the following required improvements: Place B612 concrete curbing along the driveway, customer parking The curbing on the north and east boundary of the vehicle display area shall be waived until June 30, 1996 or upon the expansion of the vehicle display area, whichever occurs first. #7: "The improvements required shall be constructed and /or installed by October 30, 1993. #8: "The outside storage of any inoperable and/or used unlicensed vehicles, or parts thereof .... " The P&Z voted to recommend that City Council approve the request from Dalles R.V. World, Inc. for a conditional use permit, as amended, for an outside display area at 7103 Highway #10 N.W. contingent upon modifying the site plan per Staff's recommendation and and contingent upon receiving amended site plan and landscaping plan. With regard to the findings of fact relating to J. and Kristie Weinmann's request for a CUP to maintain horses' - Amend the title of the resolution to read "two horses" and amend #1 to read two horses. #16: "That the proposed maintenance of horses on the subject property will not be hazardous to existing or future neighboring uses. (Delete "or disturbing").Strike all the findings (#17, 19, 21, 23 and 25) that speak to metal structures and add one finding to rea'd: :That if approved, erection of a metal accessory structure on the subject property would not be consistent with past and current enforcement policies for like size parcels (less than 2.5 acres in size). #18: "That the proposed maintenance of horses on the subject property will not substantially adversely impair the use . . ." #20: "That the proposed maintenance of horses on the subject property will not create excessive additional requirements at public cost for public facilities and services and will not be detrimental . . ." #22: "That the propQsed maintenance of horses on the subject property will not involve uses, activities, processes, materials and equipment that will be detrimental to any persons, property, . ." #24: "That if granted, the conditional use permit to maintain horses on the subject property will not confer on the Applicant a special privilege ..." C C C