My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 02/24/2015
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2015
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 02/24/2015
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/17/2025 4:02:19 PM
Creation date
2/25/2015 8:17:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
02/24/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
49
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Review File: Harvest Estates (15153 Nowthen Blvd. NW) <br />Sketch Plan Review: Comprehensive Plan and Zoning Code <br />January 30, 2015 <br />Page 3 of 5 <br />• Alpine/CSAH 5 will soon be signaled. When the northbound/southbound lights are green, southbound traffic will <br />enter the school zone at top -speeds. Previously, traffic stopped at Nowthen Boulevard/Alpine Drive before entering <br />this school zone (all way stop sign). If access is allowed to Nowthen Boulevard from this new development, the <br />County would have serious safety concerns for both commuters on CSAH 5 and the nearby school (pedestrians, <br />buses, parents, etc.). <br />• The proposed access to this site does not meet the County minimum 1/4 mile setback from the Alpine/CSAH 5 <br />intersection. This results in additional safety concerns by County staff. <br />• County staff opposes supporting any access to CSAH 5 from the City's site. However, if the City decided access is <br />required to CSAH 5, the County will not dis-approve said request. If access to CSAH 5 is a City requirement, County <br />staff would strongly recommend requiring a right-in/right-out access only; and the addition of applicable turn <br />lanes. All costs associated with turn lanes and a medians (for right -in /right -out) would be the sole cost of the City. <br />• County staff believes the two nearby accesses (Alpine Drive and 150th) provide reasonable and efficient access to the <br />new proposed development (and connection to the nearby school). <br />• County staff indicated the nearby elementary school has significant safety concerns regarding traffic along CSAH 5 now; <br />and believes this new proposed access will worsen said concerns. <br />Attached to this report is a brief traffic analysis. Please note that this analysis has not been prepared by a licensed traffic engineer <br />and is for illustrative purposes only. The City accepts no liability for sharing this information. This is a working document that <br />allows the City to adjust travel splits to impacted intersections based on local knowledge and experience. The intent of this <br />document is to illustrate cost versus benefit of requiring an additional connection to Nowthen Boulevard. <br />The site will have three (3) access points to major roads: 1) Nowthen Boulevard (at 150th Lane); 2) Alpine Drive (at Helium <br />Street); and 3) Trunk Highway (TH) 47/Saint Francis Boulevard (at 152nd Avenue). Based on a split between these three <br />intersections upon full build -out (existing homes + proposed development), it appears that the traffic levels would continue to <br />be within acceptable levels of service. <br />With a long-term net cost to the City of approximately $300,000 to $500,000 in construction, construction administration, and <br />property acquisition ($500,000 to $700,000 up front without return on investment in property acquisition), Staff does not believe <br />that the time savings of approximately one (1) to three (3) minutes is justifiable at this time. <br />Interim Improvements <br />A portion of the northernmost proposed road is impacted by the phasing plan. This area is located near the former Police <br />Department building. Staff recommends that the parking lot for this building serve as an interim turnaround due to the proposed <br />schedule, as opposed to constructing a full-sized cul-de-sac. However, the Developer is working on an interim, full-sized cul- <br />de-sac in the event Phase II does not commence construction in 2016. The Development Agreement and financial surety <br />requirement shall address this staging issue to ensure the City can react as needed. <br />Architectural Standards. Architectural renderings are not required as part of Sketch Plan Review. City Code Section 117-111 <br />requires that all structures be constructed with exterior materials consisting of face brick, natural stone, aluminum, steel, or vinyl <br />siding, wood, Masonite products, or other compatible residential materials that may be approved by the City. The assumption is <br />that the Developer will be constructing homes similar to those constructed in MEADOW, the adjacent residential development <br />constructed in 2005. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.