Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/05/2004

Home

Chairperson Nixt agreed, indicating the problem with Georgetown is there is a complete color change between units. He suggested there be a partial change of some elements. For example, if there were three colors in a schematic, those colors could be combined in different elements between units. He stated they are trying to change the look, but not make a dramatic contrast. Commissioner Van Scoy stated he would want to ensure the schematic included at least three colors that could be used throughout the building. Commissioner Brauer stated his concern with the color change is that when developers are looking at the list of acceptable changes, they are going to pick the one that is the cheapest and easiest to do, which is a color change. Commissioner Watson agreed. He stated the builders will crunch the numbers and see what is cheapest to do, and everything will still look the same. Chairperson Nixt indicated with the major change requirement they are looking at ways to achieve the color change without having a complete color change. He stated he likes the idea of a color palette, with not less than three approved colors. He indicated this will allow them to achieve deviation of facades. He suggested if the builder increases it from three to five or some other selected number they could reduce the masonry requirement. Commissioner Shepherd stated they would want a change in textures as well, rather than just the same flat vinyl siding in different colors. Commissioner Brauer suggested they require two major changes and add color to the major change list. Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon suggested they make a separate section on color and take it out of this category entirely. Chairperson Nixt agreed. He stated maybe where they could give them flexibility is on a two unit development. He indicated, however, that if the builder wants relief from the masonry requirement they would need color changes that provide the diversity masonry does. He stated when getting to four or six or eight they would need color change. Commissioner Watson stated that concerning the color palette approved is an important clarification. He would want to make sure they have the ability to approve the color scheme. Associate Planner Geisler stated this is going to require more detailed elevations than they have been getting. Commissioner Van Scoy commented that if they have an elevation and a list of colors they plan to use it should be okay. He indicated that when looking for ways to allow less masonry, he would suggest they use the major changes as leverage. He stated this would provide Staff with a standard and something with which to negotiate. Planning Commission/February 5, 2004 Page 16 of 18