Laserfiche WebLink
Chairman Heitman noted that laws of State and Federal Government take priority <br />over Charter rules and anything a Charter does is supplemental or in addition to <br />State and Federal laws. He further commented that Ramsey's current type of <br />government is function but lacks input from public. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gamec inquired if Charter makes the difference or gives the <br />opportunity? <br /> <br />Commissioner Buchanan replied that Charter gives the opportunity to make a <br />difference. Commissioner Buchanan stated that the only way to control a <br />conflict of interest between Urban area and Rural area is through a Charter. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Buchanan and seconded by Commissioner Bauerkemper <br />that as a Commission, it has been decided that a Charter for Ramsey is necessary <br />and to proceed with the writing of that Charter. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Chairman Heitman inquired if it is wise to make such a <br />decision prior to any research. <br /> <br />Commissioner Buchanan withdraws his motion. <br /> <br />Commissioner Data suggested inviting persons from other communities that are <br />Charter or recently adopted Charters, to provide input to Ramsey's Charter <br />Commission. <br /> <br />Commissioner Buchanan suggested caution should be taken to obtain an even <br />view of old and new Charter cities. Commissioner Buchanan stated that a key <br />item to be looked at in terms of Charter is to make it functional. Commissioner <br />Buchanan stated input with regards to writing a Charter or not should be <br />provided at the next Commission meeting and a decision made at that time. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lichter stated that the petition seems to say that most people <br />are in favor of a Charter being written and presented for-a vote. Writing <br />a Charter doesn't mean the City will go Charter, the petition was to write <br />a Charter and let the people decide if they want a Charter. <br /> <br />Commissioner Data stated that a broad view regarding Charter versus Statutory <br />is needed in order to make a decision whether or not to proceed with the <br />writing of a Charter. <br /> <br />Chairman Heitman stated that Charter allows for initiative of referendum, <br />which allows people to change what they want and not wait 4 years to make <br />those changes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lichter stated that Charter is a way to streamline processes in <br />the City. <br /> <br />Commissioner Gamec stated that only elected bodies can authorize spending of <br />money, therefore to streamline the process,boards such as the Park Board, <br />would have to be elected. <br /> <br />Commissioner Lichter replied that various boards could be authorized to <br />spend but that Council would retain the right to veto. <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Buchanan that the next meeting of the Ramsey Charter <br />Commission be devoted to receiving input regarding Charter versus Statutory, <br />to include persons from existing Charter cities and public input, and that <br />the Commission examine pros and cons presented and make a decision as to <br /> <br />CC/June 2, 1983 <br /> Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />