Minutes - Council - 04/13/2004 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Elvig, Kurak, Pearson, Strommen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Cook. Case #8: Request for Final Plat Review of Alpine Acres 2~d Addition Case of Oak Creek Builders Associate Planner Wald advised the final plat for Alpine Acres 2nd Addition is consistent with the preliminary plat that was approved. Councihnember Kurak questioned if the trail alignment has been taken care of. Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied the trail can be put in along Alpine Drive. Staff is working on finding credits to move it further away from the road so there is more boulevard. The trail relates to the First Addition and is not part of this plat. Councihnember Kurak inquired about the entryway. Assistant Public Works Director Olson replied that relates to the First Addition as well. Motion by Councilmember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Pearson, to adopt Resolution #04-04-094 approving the final plat of Alpine Acres second addition contingent upon compliance with City Staff review letter dated April 9, 2004 and the Developer entering into a Development Agreement with the City. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Pearson, Elvig, Strommen, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. Absent: Councilmember Cook. Case#9: Proposed Revisions to the Mixed Use - Planned Unit Development Ordinance Established in City Code Associate Planner Wald explained during the rewrite of Chapter 9 in 2003, staff brought forward a Mixed-Usc Plmmed Unit Development (MU-PUD) ordinance that would establish the opportunity for certain parcels to be developed with a mixture of residential and commercial uses. It came to staff's attention during the review of the preliminary plat for Rivenwick 4th Addition, that the MU-PUD district requires a minimum of 70% residential uses within a development. As previously stated it was the intention of the MU-PUD district to capitalize on propcrties that could provide a complimentary mixture of commercial and residential uses. The proposed 70% minimum residential requirement appears to be contradictory to the opening sentence of the MU-PUD intent statement. Staff is proposing to delete the 70% minimum residential requirement and replace it with the following statement: "to provide for an adequate mixture of commercial and residential uses and in no case shall a development contain 100% of any one usc." This would provide adequate flexibility to achieve both residential and commercial development and notify the developers that the City will not accept a development plan that includes all residential or all commercial. The Planning Commission held a public City Council/April 13, 2004 Page 27 of 33