My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/27/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council - 04/27/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:46:23 PM
Creation date
4/30/2004 1:23:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/27/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
36
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Associate Planner Geisler explained the proposed plat will gain access from 153rd Lane NW and <br />Sunfish Lake Boulevard. Access will line up with the new access being created for the Alpine <br />Acres development on the east side of Sunfish Lake Boulevard. The proposal also provides for a <br />future connection to the remainder of High Point 2nd Addition to the north and a stub street to <br />serve the lots in the southeastern portion of the plat should they redevelop in the future. The <br />proposed cul-de-sac does not exceed the 600-foot length restriction. There are several grading <br />and drainage items that must be corrected on the final plat. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler advised that the review letter from Anoka County notes that residential <br />noise standards may be exceeded and that County policy prohibits the expenditure of highway <br />Funds lbr noise mitigation efforts. The City should consider whether to require an analysis of the <br />potential roi' the noise standards to be exceeded, and requiring the developer to install appropriate <br />noise mitigation measures, or whether the City wishes to adopt a policy similar to that of the <br />county to prohibit the expenditure of funds for noise mitigation measures adjacent to county <br />highways. Staff recommends the latter option. Either such a policy should be adopted prior to <br />l'inal p l at approval, or the development agreement should contain a provision for analysis and <br />mitigation with regard to noise standards. At the April 1, 2004 meeting, the Planning <br />Commission recommended approval of the Preliminary Plat of Alpine Woods. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak asked if noise mitigation was addressed with Alpine Acres. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson responded in the negative. He explained initially staff <br />did not ask for a noise analysis to be done, as they had not seen anything from the county that <br />they would put that in their comments. He never had the vision they would have a sound xvall on <br />all their county roads. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak commented because this is so close to the intersection with the stop <br />signal, there should not be a big noise issue. Also, if this was not required at Alpine Acres she <br />does not know wily they would require it here. She does not want to see another wall. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson advised the City could adopt a similar policy as the <br />county. <br /> <br />Cotlnci hnembcr Elvig stated he would agree to adopt a policy similar to the county. He <br />questioned how this policy would be enforced. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson explained the City could not follow up with the developer <br />in 15 years, but they could inform the resident that the City has a policy stating the City does not <br />allow roi' noise walls along county roadways. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Elvig, seconded by Councilmember Strommen, to adopt a policy <br />similar to tile county to prohibit the expenditure of funds for noise mitigation measures adjacent <br />to county highways. <br /> <br />City Council/April 27, 2004 <br /> Page 23 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.