My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 05/11/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council - 05/11/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:47:38 PM
Creation date
5/6/2004 12:11:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/11/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
will say just keep the line there and half will ~ay not to. It will be up to thi, Council to decide if <br />they arc going to be a developing City. They have already made that decision and now they need <br />to move f'orward. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen stated what she is suggesting would merely be an initial public <br />hearing to let people know what the stages of the process will be and what it will look like, and <br />then to simply get value statements. With the City Hall they polled the area and asked for input, <br />which gave them their value statements. After going to these residents and asking what things <br />are important to their community, they can then take that and go through the process. <br /> <br />Councihnembcr Elvig stated he is concerned if they open this up there we will be the issue of <br />whether people want to extend the MUSA. The City should have a plan that says what they <br />anticipate doing. We have a Park Board that has been working on this. He is not against public <br />input, but they should have tools in front of people so they can start to visualize. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak questioned what kind of tools Councilmember Elvig is referring to. <br /> <br />Councihnember Elvig replied the City has a greenway plan that is laid out and a feasibility plan <br />of sewer and pipe. <br /> <br />Councihnember Strommen stated people are not going to react to a feasibility study. Finding out <br />what values are important to the community would be another tool to blend into the plan. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak questioned why title work is being discussed tonight. She stated the price <br />tag has now risen to over $300,000 after adding up all the Tinklenberg work and she cannot vote <br />for that tonight. This is way over the top and is causing a rift in the Council. She suggested this <br />be done more on a gradual basis so other things can be addressed as it goes along. She noted The <br />Tinklenberg Group is asking for $80,700 for appraisers and asked if they are qualified appraisers. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Olson replied The Tinklenberg Group would hire out residential <br />appraisers. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak suggested the discussion be reduced to what needs to be acted on tonight <br />to move this along. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director explained the estimate of Bolton and Menk was discussed in the <br />weekly update at a cost of approximately $800,000 to one million dollars for design work, which <br />does not include the Tinklenberg Group. He indicated there are some things they could move on. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak questioned if these figures are included in the original feasibility study <br />amOtll]t. <br /> <br />Assistant Public Works Director Olson responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />City Council/May 11, 2004 <br />Page 30 of 36 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.