Agenda - Council - 09/28/1982 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I I CASE ~3: ! b)Subdivision - They want to split several parcels of land which will require platting unless Council granted a variance. c) Egress and ingress onto major thoroughfares Highway #47 and County ?sad #7 - They will want to discuss this requirement with Council. Council Action: No action is required but they do want to discuss the issues to see what your feelings are on them. AUTHORIZATION TO CALL FOR PRICE QUOTES FOR PET CLINIC: Staff requests Council authorization to call for price quotes to hold the 1983 fall pet clinic. Council Action: No action necessary other than to give verbal approval. CASE ~4: PJ__~QUEST FOR A VARIANCE TO SUBDIVISION ORDINANCE; CASE OF MR. ALLEN PEARSON: Allen Pearson who operates the Pearson farm located on West Highway #10 and Bowers Drive is requesting authorization to subdivide by metes and bounds a parcel of land approximately two acres in size adjacent to Bowers Drive so he can construct a dwelling which will be both close to his farming opera- tion and his elderly mother who occupies the farm house. The subdivision would be from Parcel 10 which is 20+ acres in size and would be 200 feet in depth along Bowers Drive. While this does not comply with the subdivision ordinance, we do feel that granting the variance would be in keeping with the intent of the ordinance as the density would be at one per ten acres. The other alternate to this request would be to have Mr. Pearson request a x~oard of Adjustment variance to place a second dwelling on Plat 89230, Parcel 10. Should choose to an approval of please be advised you grant some type, that E. Q. B. approval is still necessary. Council Action: Your action in this matter will be to approve/disapprove of Mr. Pearson's request to subdivide by metes and bounds a parcel of 2+ acres in size from Flat 89230, Parcel 10. If your action is to disapprove, 'then you probably should indicate to Mr. Pearson how you would feel about a Board of Adjustment variance. This however could not be an official action at this time. A copy of the % section sheet showing the property in question is included as enclosure (D3-a) for your information. CASE #5: MOBIL_______~E HOM_____~E P___~_~ I~N REGARD~S T_~O ZONIN__G: ~'~ ~ Enclosure (D3-b) contains my response to Mr. Dick Hajek who is considering ~L ~ ~ buying a tract of land from Mr. Menkveld for a mobile home park providing ~ ~ ~ it has mobile home zoning. Mr. Menkveld has informed this person it .does . ~ ~i .~ ~*~ have the right zoning, ct 8 T ~ ~ ~ ~]e property '.that is in question is located on the NE~ of Se ion 2 , own- ~ ~ ship 32, Range 25 in the City of Ramsey. il~ ,~ Council Action: In view of the City Attorney's legal opinion which is con- ~ ' ~ tained i~the above enclosure, you will have to respond to it.