Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />'] <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> i <br /> <br />DISCUSSION OF RECOMMENDATIONS <br /> <br />WHY DLDN~f THE COMMITTEE CHOOSE FROM <br />AMONG, OR AT LEAST PRIORITIZE, THE ALTERNA- <br />TIVE METHODS OF SUBSIDIZING OPERATIONS OF A <br />RESOURCE RECOVERY FACILITY? <br /> <br />Without specific proposals for subsidies, we did not think <br />it was possible to tell what the impact of various methods <br />of subsidy would be in terms of the criteria we think are <br />important. <br /> <br />DID THE COI~fiMITTEE RATE THE CRITERIA THAT <br />ARE TO BE USED IN THE EVALUATION OF METHODS <br />EQUALLY, OR DOES THE LIST REFLECT THE RELA- <br />TIME IMPORTANCE OF THE CRITERIA? <br /> <br />The list reflects how we would prioritize the criteria. <br /> <br />-15- <br /> <br /> <br />