Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />,I <br /> I <br /> I <br />,I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />Transit capila] ftmdinff has varied from G6-2/3 to 85 <br />pcri'ent, dClwndmg (m the federal program. Currently, <br />tile Urban Mass Transit Administration provides 80 <br />percent, Federal Aid Urban projects receive 70 per. <br />cent or greater and Inter~ta~ Substitution projects <br />get 85 percent. Percentages may be changed before <br />Congress adopts the foderal budget. Minnesota <br />provides no funding for transi~ capital purposes. <br /> <br />Though current legislation is pending, the Federal <br />Aviation Administration (FAA) has traditionally <br />played an important role in airport funding. Airport <br />Development Aid Program (ADAP) improvements <br />have been funded at 75 percent at the Minneapolis- <br />St. Paul International Airport. The Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation, Division of <br />Aeronautics (MDA), provided 12.5 percent. At the <br />Region's intermediate and minor airports the FAA <br />share has been 80 percent and MDA's 10 percent. For <br />non-A DAP projects, there is no federal assistance; <br />normally MDA pays 80 percent at the secondary <br />airports. These programs are subject to funding <br />revisions in fuh~re budgets. <br /> <br />Since 1977, acquisition and development of the <br />regional parks has heen paid from a direct state <br />appropriation of bond funds. Tbe Council expects <br />the Legislature to fund the current capital improve- <br />ment program, too. There is no federal assistance <br />for regional parks. <br /> <br />In short, while federal and state funding for regional <br />capital improvements has been substantial, the future <br />is clouded. To assure peace of mind for residents and <br />to make sure the needs of your community are <br />considered by neighboring communities and regional <br />agencies, you should take advantage of a CIP. Each <br />government or agency--township, city, county and <br />metropolitan--must do a good job of capital improve- <br />ment planning if government is to become better at <br />setting priorities and spending money economically <br />in times of severe financial limitations. <br /> <br />Department of Energy, Planning and <br />Development to Administer Small <br />Communities Block Grant Program <br /> <br />The State Department of Energy, Planning and <br />Development plans to take over administration of the <br />Small Cities Community Development Block Grant <br />Program in fiscal 1983, which begins Oct. 1, 1982. <br />Until then, the Department of Housing and Urban <br />Development (HUD) will continue to administer the <br />program. <br /> <br /> The state has circulated a draft of its small cities <br />program design and scheduled six meetings to solicit <br />--comments from local officials and citizens around the <br /> state. The Metropolitan Area meeting was held Dec. 4. <br /> <br />4 <br /> <br />The sm;dj cilics program was one of 37 federal <br />cateeorical programs folded into nine major block <br />grant pro,rams in thc Omnibus Budget Reconciliation <br />Act passed by Congress in August. States have the <br />option to assume administrative responsibilities of <br />the block grant programs beginning in fiscal 1982. <br /> <br />The Reagan administration said tim block grant <br />approach would reduce duplication and over- <br />regulation in many federal categorical aid programs. <br />State administration is also expected to make the <br />programs more responsive to local needs and <br />priorities. <br /> <br />The small cities program made grants totaling $19.7 <br />miIlion to "nonentitlement" communities and <br />counties in Minnesota during 1981. <br /> <br />Local governments use the grants for community <br />development activities that include housing, public <br />facilities and economic development. The program <br />aims to promote development of viable communities <br />by providing decent housing and a suitable living <br />environment, while expanding economic oppor- <br />tunities principally for people with low and moderate <br />incomes. Eligible projects must meet one of three <br />objectives: 1) benefit principally people with low <br />and moderate incomes; 2) aid in prevention of slums <br />and bIight; and 3) meet other community develop- <br />ment needs having a particular urgency. <br /> <br />In fiscal 1981, Minnesota received about $19 million <br />under the small cities program. For fiscal 1982, the <br />funding level for Minnesota is authorized at $23 <br />million. The exact funding level will not be set <br />until Congress approves the revised budget for fiscal <br />1982; action is expected in December. <br /> <br />Alth0ugh final regulations for the small cities <br />program will not be published until at least March <br />1982, HUD will conduct workshops starting in <br />January at the state conference of the National <br />Association of Housing and Redevelopment Officials <br />(NAHRO) at Quadna Mountain Resort in Hill City, <br />Minn. Other workshops will be conducted through- <br />out the state beginning in February. <br /> <br />Dates for submitting applications and for final <br />approval are tentative. The HUD area office antici- <br />pates that the earliest it can receive applications will <br />be mid-April, with final approval in July. <br /> <br />For more information on state administration of the <br />small cities program, contact Jay Fonkert of the State <br />Department of Energy, Planning and Development at <br />296-8953. Questions about HUD administration for <br />fiscal 1982 should be directed to Doug Guthrie at <br />349-3022. <br /> <br /> <br />