My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/22/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 12/22/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:41:13 PM
Creation date
5/24/2004 7:50:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/22/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
or~ng <br /> arter <br /> <br />PART OF A SERIES <br /> <br />Without moving from the driver's seat, <br />Phoenix sanitation man Leonard McDade <br />pulls up 1o a 90-galhm garbage container, <br />grabs it with the truck's mechanical arms, <br />and dumps the contents. One man with a <br />mechanized side-loader can pick up as <br />much garbage as Ihree men used to. Phoe- <br />nix has cut the sanilation force by 63% and <br />saves $3 million a year. One-man crews <br />get 11% extra pay. <br /> <br />! <br />~aking bureaucracy more effective <br />"~s tou, gh, but some rare successes prove- <br />~t can be done. <br /> <br />Why_.-Government <br /> - Works Dumb <br /> <br /> ly JEREMY MAIN <br />~Politics and productivity don't seem to <br />~mix. Politicians denounce waste and mis- <br />'"'management but, once elected, usually <br /> appear incapable of improving govern- <br />.nent effectiveness. It's a pity, because the <br />creases in productivity achieved by Ja- <br />pan and by the best-managed U.S. com- <br />oanies, if applied to government, would <br />eliver huge savings to the taxpayer. The <br />int Economic Committee of Congress <br />figured in 1979 that a 10% improvement <br />lin the output of the nation's 2.8 million <br />federal workers would lop $8 billion out <br />of the budget--without reducing services. <br />· Research associate: Anna Cifelli <br /> <br />146 FORTUNE A~t.~O, ~9a~ <br /> <br /> Like Proposition 13 in California, <br />Ronald Reagan's unprecedented budget <br />cuts will prod civil servants to do more <br />with less. But wholesale reductions alone <br />are not enough and sometimes hurt. To <br />achieve short-run economies, govern- <br />ment' officials often eliminate the capital <br />investments, maintenance, planning, and' <br />training that would improve performance <br />in the long run. In its fiscal crisis of <br />1975, for instance, New York City <br />chopped deeply into maintenance and <br />capital spending, accelerating a deteri- <br />oration in plant that has sapped .services <br />and productivity. <br /> <br /> Reagan's knife is slicing i~to the Of- <br />fice of Personnel Management's efforts <br />to organize a federal productivity drive-- <br />meager as those efforts have been in <br />the past. As business has discovered, pro- <br />ductivity campaigns aren't likely to catch <br />on without a firm commitment from <br />the chief executive. Although a few state <br />and local governments have put together <br />successful productivity programs, Rea- <br />gan, like his predecessors, has not yet <br />shown interest in adopting a compre- <br />hensive system that sets goals, measures <br />results, and rewards performance. <br /> Here and there--in Phoenix, iri North <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.