My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/22/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 12/22/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:41:13 PM
Creation date
5/24/2004 7:50:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/22/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
'1 <br /> 81-47 <br /> <br />November 20, 1981 <br /> <br /> The Economy <br /> <br />CHARLES STEELE SPEAKS ON MEASURING PRODUCTIVITY <br /> <br />I believe that many of the answers to productivity problems can be found in the individual com- <br /> pany, and corrective action, should begin with top managements that can provide the clear think- <br /> ing required. In order for a business to make improvements, it should measure, as much as pos- <br /> sible, the elusive quality of productivity. <br /> <br />These views were expressed by DH&S Managing Partner Charles G. Steele this week to businessmen <br /> at The Town Hall of Los Angeles. Some excerpts from Mr. Steele's presentation: <br /> <br />While U.S. productivity remains the highest in the world, we face some problems at the national <br /> level. Our labor productivity during recent years has been declining. Real incomes can rise, and <br /> the nation's standard of living can improve, only when productivity per worker increases at a rate <br /> that is at least equal to increases in wage rates. If the present situation persists, however, and <br /> productivity continues to decline, our expectations about rising living standards cannot be met. <br /> <br />The problem is compounded by the positive rates of productivity growth of some of our major inter- <br /> national trading partners. Projections of current trends indicate that, if the U.S. productivity does <br /> not improve, 2 or 3 nations will surpass us in productivity within a few years. <br /> <br />I believe that the undesirable national decline in productivity can be improved significantly through <br /> initiatives taken by individual businesses. <br /> <br />Encou raging Developments <br /> <br />Regardless of the apparent shortcomings of the statistics, I see encouraging developments for pro- <br /> ductivity on the national level. One such development is the recent passage of the Economic <br /> Recovery Tax Act. It provides incentives for research and development and for plant and equip- <br /> ment investment. ~-he Tax Act also lowers marginal tax rates, thereby increasing the incentive to <br /> work, save and invest. <br /> <br />The Task Force on Regulatory Relief, headed by Vice President George Bush, and the newly-appointed <br /> National Productivity Advisory Committee, chaired by William Simon, offer businesses the op- <br /> portunity to support regulatory reform and to make suggestions for further improvements in our <br /> nation's productivity. <br /> <br />Productivity initiatives outside the government sector are a'lso encouraging. One example is the <br /> American Productivity Center in Houston, founded several years ago by Jackson Grayson. It de- <br /> votes significant resources to develop national policy recommendations for improving productiv- <br /> ity and to increase the nation's awareness of the importance of productivity and the benefits of <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.