My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 12/22/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 12/22/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:41:13 PM
Creation date
5/24/2004 7:50:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
12/22/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
187
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />J. STEPHEN SCHMID T <br /> P.O. BOX 71 <br /> ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 <br /> <br />Page-3- <br /> <br />ltousing is another possible use to which this parcel might be put, but the <br />accompanying reports regarding the site by Hakanson,hnderson Associates <br />indicates a basement could be no deeper than 4 feet,-an unusual type of <br />construction in Minnesota. In addition, a residence wou]d not seem compatible <br />with all the commercial activity and vehicular travel immediately adjacent on <br />both streets. <br /> <br />Industry, with sewer, heavy road, high water use, and trackage needs, hardly <br />seems compatible. <br /> <br />I believe this site is unique in that: <br /> <br />1) It is not agriculturally viable <br />2) It has tremendous commercial potential <br />3) It is not surrounded by residences <br />4) It has no wild and natural value <br />5) It is not a prime park site <br />6) It does not have industrial possibilities <br /> <br />SITE SUITABILITY <br /> <br />As may be seen from the accompanying letter from Hakanson, Anderson <br />Associates's engineers, addressed to myself, numerous test borings were made <br />on the site and findings made. All of our assumptions and preliminary sketches <br />are based on inspections I have personally made of similar sites and Hakanson, <br />Anderson's opinions. The technology involved is neither experimental, revolu- <br />tionary, nor excessively expensive. <br /> <br />TWO - SITE PROBLEMS <br /> <br />There appear to be two (2) questions in many people's minds regarding the site, <br />both of which are caused by a presumption of high ground water. <br /> <br />HIGH WATER - Suitable for Foundations? <br /> <br />The answer to this question is an emphatic YES! Engineers of Hakanson, <br />Anderson in their letter to myself of January 15, 1979 states in paragraph 4 <br />that "the site appears, therefore to be suitable for construction of slab on <br />grade type of structures". This is precisely the type of construction we contemplate. <br />It is also the construction method used beneath our present bank, Bob's, and <br />Moroz Hardware, which have similar soil and water conditions. HIGH GROUND <br />WATER PRESENTS NO UNIQUE PROBLEMS. <br /> <br />-continued- <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.