Laserfiche WebLink
! <br /> I <br /> 1 <br /> <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />J. STEPHEN SCHMIDT <br /> P.O. BOX 71 <br /> ANOKA, MINNESOTA 55303 <br /> <br />Page-fi- <br /> <br />HIGH WATER - What About Septic? <br /> <br />1 believe there are two basic problems which must be addressed in desi.~ning <br />septic systems. One is the soil type, and the other is elevation for drainage. <br />Let us address them indiyidually. <br /> <br />SOIL TYPE - Fine! <br /> <br />Referring if you will to the second page of the Hakanson, Anderson January 15th <br />letter, you will see "based on our observations of the soil materials, we expect <br />the site to have suitable percolation characteristics for septic system drainfields". <br />In addition, I have personally inspected shopping center sites where soils were <br />not suitable and all the material was brought in. I am confident the Ramsey <br />Engineer has also seen this. Should it be necessary, we too, could do this. <br /> <br />SOIL, WATER AND ELEVATION <br /> <br />As again may be seen from the Hakanson, Anderson letter of January 15th, a <br />shallow or mounded drainfield system would be necessary. This is no great <br />technological marvel. I have inspected a shopping center built in a hole, where <br />the beautiful flowered berms surrounding the center are actually the mounded <br />drainfields, with sewage pumped to the top and draining out in ordinary fashion. <br />I also inspected a mounded drainfield built on solid rock by the Anoka City <br />Engineer In this case, all the materials were hauled in and the waste water <br />was lifted 20 ft. in elevation from the shore of Lake Superior to the mound. <br />Mounded septic systems are simple and effective. <br /> <br />My architect, Mr. Jay Johnson of Miller, Hanson, Westerbeck, and Bell has <br />been in contact with Hakanson, Anderson regarding design specifications on <br />this matter. We would meet whatever requirements our engineers specified given <br />final building dimensions and use. <br /> <br />Hakanson, Anderson gave specifications for public toilets in each of four stores (8) <br />whereas a more likely configuration would be four public toilets in a common area. <br />Even with 8 toilets the mounds would use only 8,000 sq. ft. of the total site, which <br />exceeds 200,000 sq.ft. Obviously, any but the very highest water uses could be <br />easily accommodated. <br /> <br />OTI-IER S OBJECTIONS <br /> <br />1) Private Citizens <br /> <br />Public hearings afford ample opportunity for persons having legitimate <br />objections to proposed zoning changes, and for persons speaking in favor <br />of such changes. The businesses clustered around Highway //47 and 167th <br />have not attempted to mobilize our customers to attend this meeting. We <br />have, however, had a near unanimous response to the provision of more <br />services and retailers at the site. The response is "wouldn't that be great! <br /> <br />-continued- <br /> <br /> <br />