My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1981
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1981
>
Agenda - Council - 11/25/1981
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 1:41:01 PM
Creation date
5/24/2004 8:03:17 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
11/25/1981
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
199
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
NAIOP <br />LEGISLATIVE <br /> REPORT <br /> <br />Boyd Stofer reported that the NOVEMBER 17 <br />first session of the November 17 ALL-DAY SEMINAR <br />All-Day Seminar to be held at the <br />Radisson South will be devoted to legislative matters. Jim <br />Stuebncr will introduce the topic, followed by Boyd handing out <br />the legislative package. This package will give NAIOP members <br />the names of the representatives and senators they should call in <br />their respective areas. Also included will be a recent copy of <br />NAIOP's national "Public Affairs Update", as an example of the <br />kind of material we might prepare on a state-wide basis in <br />contacting our legislators. Jim Erickson of the Hoffman firm <br />will speak on upcoming legislative topics. <br />Chairman Stuebncr reported that local legislative activities will <br />be supported by a grant of $100 per developer member from the <br />national NAIOP office. <br />Chairman Stacbner met with the League of Economic <br />Development Organizations (LEDO) on October 29 in <br />Washin gton, D.C. to help set up a unified position on such matters. <br />The real estate community has historically taken opposing <br />positions on crucial issues, and it is necessary to unify our efforts <br />for greater impact. <br /> <br />All chapter presidents and Legis- FIRST NATIONAL <br />lative Cmnmittee members are LEGISLATIVE <br />urged to attend the first annual CONVENTION <br />national Legislative Conference <br />to be held in Washington, D.C. on <br />April 18, 19 and 20, 1982. This meeting is patterned after the <br />Minnesota session last spring. It will have training sessions in <br />how to communicate with members of Congress and, on the last <br />day, each delegate will have a private appointment with <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />legislators from his home state <br />Spouses are invited. <br /> <br />NAIOP has testified repeatedly <br />on this subject before and met <br />with considerable success in <br />developing language more amen- <br />able to all parties; however, now <br />that the guidelines are about to <br />be published, there will be a need <br /> <br />to meet on a face-to-face basis. <br /> <br />PROPOSED <br />GUIDELINES FOR <br />ENVIRONMENTAL <br />IMPACT <br />STATEMENTS <br /> <br />for additional hearings. The danger is that some of the <br />compromises worked out earlier may not be included in the new <br />document. Linda Fisher of the Hoffman firm reports that new <br />categories requiring an EIS may be created. Jim Erlckson will <br />review the matter during the all-day seminar on November 17. The <br />big problem is that with the cutbacks necessary to reduce current <br />deficits, many smaller cities may not have the staffs to prepare the <br />required reports or review them once prepared, with the burden <br />thus falling upon the developer. <br /> <br />A meeting has been scheduled PROPERTY TAXES <br />for November 3 to coordinate our <br />position on the local property tax issue with other interested <br />groups such as the BOMA chapters of Minneapolis and St. <br />Paul and the International Council of Shopping Centers <br />(ICSC). <br /> <br />National Public Affairs advi- THE D~AMATO <br />sot, Margaret Smith, directed AMENDMENT <br />our attention to the test vote that <br />will have been taken on Friday, October 30. Senator D'Amato <br />has proposed an amendment to an appropriation's bill to preclude <br />the use of any funds to restrict with use of IRB umbrella financing <br />by the IRS. She urged everyone to contact Senators Durenberger <br />and Boschwltz, or their aides to support the D'Amato amendment. <br />While this amendment concerns an appropriations bill rather <br /> <br />than IRB legislation directly, a negative vote might be construed <br />as a lack of Senate support for IRB financing. No legislation is yet <br />pending in the Senate. <br /> <br />The immediate concern is House Bill No. 4420 which would <br />eliminate IRB financing except for distressed areas. The danger is <br />that President Reagan may try to eliminate IRB financing in <br />total because of its reported abuses as a concession to effect <br />passage of his second tax bill. However, Tim Berger, Senator <br />Boschwitz's Aide, reports that if and when such a bill is passed, it <br />probably will not contain any retroactive feature and also that its <br />effective date will be delayed for some time. <br /> <br />The recent Houston conference HOUSTON ACTION <br />approved a formal statement on ON IRB FINANCING <br />IRB financing, which follows: <br /> <br /> "Given the current economic climate, IRB financ- <br /> ing has taken on increasing significance as a <br /> financing tool available to our industry. At this <br /> time, no changes should be made in their availabil- <br /> ity. It is our concern that IRBs continue to be <br /> available as a financing alternative for job- <br /> producing industrial and office buildings." <br /> <br />Our people in Washington fear TROUBLE IN <br />that the President's economic REAGAN'S <br />program is in trouble. If all PROGRAM? <br />special interest groups fight their <br />own budget cuts, and succeed, <br />then there will be no reduction in the federal deficit. NAIOP is <br />thinking of publishing ads in all major cities supporting the <br />President's economic program and urging the public to give it a <br />chance. Boyd Stofer pointed out that the home builders have <br />gone on record labelling the President's program as being anti- <br />housing. It was the opinion of the committee that as serious as this <br />is for the home builders, it was also important to show that part of <br />the real estate community is willing to look at the long term <br />benefits and support the President's program in order to avoid the <br />difficulties that will result if everyone does not share in reducing <br />the deficit. <br /> <br />Chairman Stuebner met with MINNESOTA <br />Governor Quie twice on Octo- BUSINESS <br />bet 28 to review the Minnesota CLIMATE <br />deficit and its impact on local <br />property taxes. The Minnesota <br />deficit appears to be far greater than originally suspected and <br />state aid to some cities may be eliminated indefinitely. The easiest <br />solution for local governments is to increase property taxes. James <br />Stuebner asked members of the committee for constructive ideas <br />as to what position NAIOP might be able to take to help solve the <br />problem. <br />The recently announced departure of Jeno's from Duluth is <br />creating more concern on a state level. Several members described <br />other Minnesota firms who are leaving for other locations and <br />expanding elsewhere. <br />Our business climate questionnaire will be mailed out before the <br />November 17 meeting and reviewed at that conference. When all <br />the examples of firms who have left Minnesota are summarized, <br />we can probably find a good part of the $600 million loss in revenue <br />creating Governor Quie's present problem. <br />The committee recognized that the fiscal problem has existed for <br />considerable time and that no one particular administration is to <br />blame. However, it feared that a constructive solution will be lost <br />in the attempt to fix blame on particular incumbents. <br />Chairman Stuebner urged committee members to come up with <br />constructive ideas to improve the Minnesota business climate and <br />avoid a political blaming session. We must keep our attention <br />directed to the main problem. <br /> <br /> Jeff Coult, Secretary <br /> " NAIOP Legislative Committee <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.