04/19/77 Public Hearing - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

7. Norman Griner, 5~lI0 177th Lane N.W. (Lot 7/B1. 1) Carol J. Griner lot 7, Bl. 1)5410 177th Lane N.W. pg. 2 Planning & Zoning .Public Hearing 4/1Q/77 The following were people ~resent that voiced their position on the conditional use permit. (present) Robert So]~ett, Lot 1/B1.3, wanted to know if the dogs were licensed. Mr. Odegaard sa~s they were not. He then objected because this area is zoned residential. It was pointed out by City iAttorney Bill Goodrich that a dog ordinance was in effect since the Odegaards moved Mr. Vern Ohman, (present) iLot 5/B1.2, 17735 Erkium Street N.W. is against the conditional use permit. Mr. John Tillery (present)!Lot 4/B1. 2 is opposed to thins permit. He has been awakened several times and considered this a nuisance. Mrs.Benson, (present) Lot ~, objected to this permit because of the barking. Charles Skordahl, Lot 6/Bl.~ 2 objects to the kennel license because it devalues his property. Mr. Lentz (present) Lot 3/~1.1, said he visited the residence and found the place in a clean condition.~ He said he objects to a commercial kennel license. He said the neighbor dogs o~her than Odegaards do a lot of barking. Mrs. Hughes (present) Lot 8~B1. 1, says says she objects to the kennel permit. She has no dogs of her own., Mr. Woltman (present), Loti2/B1.3, objects to the eprmit because the barking the dogs make. He has one ~og. Mrs. Soyett (present) Lot 1/BI 3 objects to the granting of a conditional use permit. Mrs. Sandra Watroga (Lot 2/~1.1) objects to having the permit issued. Mrs. Theresa Henderson (Lotl3/B1. 4) 17640 Cobalt Street N.W. appeared tonight to object to the noise the dog~ make. City Attorney Goodrich explained that this is officially the first time that the Odegaard's have appeared to apply for a conditional use permit under Ord. 76-4. They had been at other meetings but they were not officially acted upon because of various reasons.' Attorney Gurewitz, attorneylfor Odegaards, then proposed that the Odegaards build a building to house t~e dogs, thus reducing or eliminating the noice from the barking dogs. Discussion followed on this matter. Mayor Cox said for the reco~d that there were complaints about the dogs in this area before the present dog lordinance was made, (76-4). Mr. Larry Lundy (Lot 3/B1. 2!) had signed a statement that he did not object but was trying to sell his h~me at the present time. Hearing cTosed at 8:30 P.M.