My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 05/05/2016
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2016
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 05/05/2016
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:20:22 PM
Creation date
6/7/2016 12:46:07 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/05/2016
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Commissioner Andrusko believed the Commission needed to sort through the issues in order to <br />find the context where the matter can be approved. He wanted to see greenspace within this <br />development for children. <br />Commissioner VanScoy asked what the zoning was for this property. <br />City Planner Anderson indicated the property was zoned Cor 4, Subdistrict B, which meant it <br />could have between four and 15 units per acre. <br />Commissioner VanScoy clarified that this was a stand-alone request and not a reconsideration of <br />the plat. He asked if the plat required a variance given the fact that it does not meet the City's <br />standards. <br />City Planner Anderson stated this was a standalone project. He explained the past minutes were <br />reviewed and based on those numbers, staff believed the request was reasonable to move <br />forward. However, the Commission could elect to approve the Preliminary Plat contingent upon <br />the applicant receiving a variance. <br />Commissioner VanScoy clarified he did not support the project as proposed. He believed a <br />mistake was made that had to be corrected. He recommended the project be amended to meet the <br />City's standards. He wanted to see a more pedestrian friendly development with additional <br />greenspace. He stated he would be willing to review this development again, only if brought to <br />the City with a variance request. <br />Chairperson Levine questioned how the Commission should proceed. <br />City Planner Anderson commented staff was seeking direction and a recommendation on the <br />development from the Commission. <br />Commissioner VanScoy understood the applicant was a good developer. His concern rested with <br />the density. <br />Motion by Commissioner VanScoy, seconded by Commissioner Andrusko, to recommend that <br />City Council approve the Preliminary Plat, contingent upon compliance with the Staff Review <br />Letter and directing staff to work with the applicant to revise the plat to meet the City's 15 units <br />per acre net density standards. <br />Further discussion <br />Mike Suel, DR Horton, indicated he was willing to work with staff to address the concerns of the <br />Commission. He commented he would work to get the development down to 72 units. <br />Commissioner Brauer asked how many units would be lost by the developer. <br />Planning Commission/May 5, 2016 <br />Page 3 of 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.