Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/08/2004

Home

· Irrigation ib~' Riverdalc Park. · Landscape Jmp~'ovements. · A park name: monumenl. · Parking spa{:cs. Project administration slaking $17,000 $19,000 $ 6,500 $14,000 $ 5,O00 $131,500 Civil Engineer II Linton noted thcs,~, improvements were proposed to be constructed concurrent with Rivenwick Village's develop~e~t. The cash contribution for Park Dedications was 195 units ~ $2,200 = S429,000. Cred.ting the Developer for the improvements noted above left a balance of $297,500 to be paid at ti~e time the plat was filed. The cash-only trail dedication was 195 kT~ $550 -- $107,250. The e;timated cost for construction of the trail in the park was $17,000, leaving a balance of $90,~ 50 due at plat filing. The Rivenwick 3rd Addition, which was on the south, side of Riverdale, r~,quirements included installing a trail on the north side of Riverdale. This trail had not yet been installed. A trail was necessary on the south side of Riverdale Drive b(:cause Riverdale was an MSA street. This trail would not be credit eligible. The Developer might wahl to con ;ider installing the Rivenwick 3rd trail on the south side of Riverdale and the Rivenwick Village i~rail or, the north side of Riverdale. It was noted th ttt both numbers "19 ~'~ and "195" were used when discussing the number of units in Rivenwick Village. Civil. Engineer il I~inton stated he bdicved the appropriate number was "192." Chairperson ,lohns asked if the trail exlcnsion connected to Mississippi West Park. Principal City [:;ngineer Olson resp~ md¢:d it did. Civil Engineer I[ l,inton noted the irail on the south side would be adjacent to Mississippi West Park, with another trail providing a walking route to Highway 10 and Town Center. The Ramsey Boulevard com~ection south of High,way 10 -was provided last summer for access to the site. Civil Engineer II l~inton stated tbs was a PUD and the developer had been asking for many concessions on Ci'i.y Code issues. One: of the things the City could request was continuation of the trail along the north of Riverdat :~ ~o Ram sey. Chairperson Johns asked if it wa~ thcz small stretch north of Highway 10 that was not credit eligible. Discu:~sir-,n followed. Civil Engineer Il ~inton noted the ti:ail adjacent to the parcel on the north side and continuing west would be ihc developt',r's resp )nsibility. Chairperson Johns asked how man',, p~,,rking spaces were available. Park and I:'~ecreation Commission/April 8, 2004 Page 6 of 21