Laserfiche WebLink
that area are already prohibited f~om subdividing because of the location <br />in which homes were placed on the lots. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember DeLuca directing <br />that City Staff prepare a resolution for Council consideration that would <br />establish a policy of the City paying 50% of the sewer and water <br />assessments for those properties probhibited from subdividing as a result <br />of airport safety zoning - ' <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated that it has been m~de clear by both sides that <br />action on the proposed zoning should be finalized so they can take action <br />as they see fit. <br /> <br />Mr. Hartley presented a resolution that Mn/Dot recommends as the format to <br />be used in adopting an airport safety zoning ordinance; adoption of that <br />resolution would in turn adopt the airport safety zoning ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca inquired if there would be a problem in modifying the <br />zoning to accommodate the existing facility if municipal involvement in the <br />airport fails. <br /> <br />Merland Otto stated it is not uncommon to modify airport safety zoning from <br />time to time; there would be no problem modifying it to accommodate the <br />facility as it exists. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca stated that there is an airport and there should be <br />zoning in place for it. Councilmember DeLuca stated that he is in favor of <br />adopting airport zoning and maybe holding an advisory election on whether <br />or not the facility should be owned by and operated by the city. <br /> <br />Mr. Ot~c noted that the zoning establishes clear zones for a one runway <br />-=yste~ ra~her than the tvo current!-~- in use a~ Gateway; thi~ action will <br />not double ~he use of the one runway. Mr. Otto stated :ha'- he doesn't see <br /> <br />differen: fr~ thc: whi~h is proposed. <br /> <br />Counci!me~er ?carson inquired a~ zo the consequences if zonimg is enacted, <br /> - ~cri~ e issue ~ ~ic!pat ~- olv=~=~ <br />p!'c!=g = ~cra~ on deve!o.~---_ent~ and th ' c~ ' ' <br />in =he airpcrt faii~. <br /> <br />-~'- even ~-~ i~v, tn~ <br />~_. Counc!i=~amber ~earson's saenarii. <br /> <br />~- ~. ; ' 'i.~ed that ~= City would e×r-ose it==~; =o ~ama£es if <br />.... ~O0~r/c~: con_- .__ ~ . ___. ~ ' <br /> <br />-h~: %'as ~t ..... sary f~r th_ ' ~;- airpor~ ~-. Goodrich ~c~t~ that a <br /> City Counci!/O~o~er 13, I987 <br /> <br />Page 8 of 16 <br /> <br /> <br />