Laserfiche WebLink
Chaiman Pete£son - Replied that hauling on wirdy days would be addressed <br />in the coaditional use ~emit. <br /> <br />~. ~ - Stated that he di~et believe that zesldents in Elk ~iver, <br />S~erbume County, were notified and that they would lxcbably have concerns <br />because they would also have to look at the excavaticm <br /> <br />Sandy Shapell - 9325 164th Lane - Inquired whether fencing would ~e <br />required around the excavated areas to p~event access by children and <br />wheelers. <br /> <br />?.ep~..ted..t~ .1.~orth. f. ork ,ould ob~iously have , liabilit~ for the <br /> <br /> r~.~y ue pos~eo wx~n signs. ~. Peck also <br /> that the City would require slopes not to exceed certain limits. <br /> <br />I~vid l>~velik - 8551 156th Lane - Inquired as to the long term effect of <br />the lake and ii it would impact Lake Itasca. <br /> <br />~lr. l~ehbein - Replied that the manmade lake would be separate fr~n Lake <br />Itasca. <br /> <br />~r. l~ck - Ca~mted that there an overalI storm water drainage plan <br />that the City is in the process iofs adoptin9. If the manmde lake reaches a <br />certain level, the overflow w/Il drain into Lake Itasca; Lake Itasca <br />overflc~ will drain south tc~ards l~y. 10. <br /> <br />l~vid Pavelik - Inquired if 1~ lying areas to the east would be develcged. <br /> <br />~r. Peck - Replied that 35 acres has been deeded to the City as park land~ <br />no other develol~.nt is proposed on the east side c~ Lake ltasca. <br /> <br />~otion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by Camisstoner Howell to <br />adjourn the public hearing. <br /> <br /> tim carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Ccmdssioners Deemer, <br /> way, Zimmer, Bo~ell, Bendriksen and LaDue. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />~l~e public hearir~ adjourned at 8:04 p.m. <br />~espect~ull¥ su~nitted, <br /> <br />Sylvis Prolik <br />Secretary <br /> <br />C~m~ty ~eve~olze~t Director <br /> <br />Public Bearinc~ch 3, 1987 <br /> <br />~age 3 o~ 3 <br /> <br /> <br />