Laserfiche WebLink
that area are already prohibited from gubdividing because of the location <br />in which homes were placed on the 1 o t ~ <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Cox and seconded by Councilmember DeLuca directing <br />that City Staff prepare a resolution for Council consideration ttlat would <br />establish a policy of the City-paying 50% of the sewer and ~'ater <br />assessments for those properties pr0bhibited from subdividing as a result <br />of airport safety zoning, <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Reimann, Councilmembers Sorteberg, Cox, <br />DeLuca and Pearson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated that it has been made clear by both sides that <br />action on the proposed zoning should be finalized so they can t~ke action <br />as they see fit. <br /> <br />Mr, Hartley presented a resolution that Mn/Dot recommends as the format to <br />be used in adopting an airport safety zoning ordinance; adoption of that <br />resolution would in turn adopt the airport safety zoning ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca inquired if there would be a problem in modifying the <br />zoning to accommodate the existing facility if municipal involvement in the <br />airport fails. <br /> <br />Merland Otto stated it is not uncommon to modify airport safety zoning from <br />time to time; there would be no problem modifying it to accommodate the <br />facility as it exists, <br /> <br />Councilmember DeLuca stated that there is an airport and there should be <br />zoning in place for it. Counci!member DeLuca stated that he is in favor of <br />adopting airport zoning and maybe holding an advisory election on whether <br />or not the facility should be owned by and operated by the city. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto noted that the zoning establishes clear zones for a one runway <br />system rather than the two currently in use at Gateway; this action will <br />not double the u~e of the one runway. ¥.'r. Otto stated that he doesn't see <br />that a zoning ordinance for the existing facility will be radically <br />different from that which is proposed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pearson_.~-~u;-=a ........ a= te ~h~ ~-~e~.~.c~_. if zoning _~ enacted, <br />~iacing ~ ~cratcriur- on d=~!c-~er.t, and the is=u= cf -'~-~ ~vc~"~-~n~ <br /> the airport fails. <br /> <br />.._,v- Ot=c rer!ied, that rec^~.~. court cases india=t=-- ~ that if develcom*nt. _ <br />r_s~*i~,,~ are taken a~-av, from =- pr~o=-tv.:__ . o~'n_r= , eve~ temoorariiv,. . t~at_ <br />~oper%¥~. . owner may. have to be comDex, sate~-. ~, '~ere.~, may. be a risk =:soci-ted-~ = <br /> <br />· Yr. Goodrich cenfi_-m=d that the City would expose itse <br />Councii,-,.ember 7carson's scenario would occur, especially in areas cf zcming <br />that ~'as not necessary for the e):isting airoort.. ~!r, Goodrich note~ ~'~r:a~ a <br /> <br /> .. Coun~ October <br /> <br />Page g cf !g <br /> <br /> <br />