My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
12/09/87
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Dissolved Boards/Commissions/Committees
>
Economic Development Commission
>
Agendas
>
1987
>
12/09/87
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
6/13/2025 11:50:32 AM
Creation date
6/22/2004 11:26:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Document Title
Economic Development Commission
Document Date
12/09/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
118
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
bonus development rights in exuhange for right-of-way, should be conside_~ed <br />as alternatives. <br /> <br />The most important steps to the implementation of a frontage road system <br />are: <br /> <br />To identify the most feasible, suitable location. <br />To pzotect the right-of-~ray fz-om fur~mr develctz~_nt. <br />To acc~?~ ~e the right-of-way. <br /> <br />The mobilization of a c~ittee of owners to develop a master plan for the <br />area between the raiiwoad and TH 10 could facilitate the implamentation of <br />the frontage road system north of TH 10. <br /> <br />Railroad Crossincrs <br /> <br />Ideally, the ~ rail cross~ at CR 83, CR 56 and CR 57 should be 9iade- <br />separated for reasons of safety and capacity. Unfortunately, grade <br />separations are costly ard difficult to justify in s~rict economic terms. <br />5his problem is c~cunded in the study ar~a bec~_ause of the short <br />between the railroad and TH 10. Burlkngton Northern Railroad reqt~ a <br />vertical cl~ of 23 feet be~een th~ rail and the soffit of a cross~ <br />structure. Because of wirmar icin~ of roads, th~ gradient of the road <br />crossing the ra4~oad should not exceed four percent. In addition, a <br />vertical cu:c~e at ~ ~ cf the ~Dssir~ ~-~t be provided to ensure safe <br />stopping sight distance and one must also be provided at the bottam of the <br />grade to ensure safe stopping si.~ht d~.~nce within a vehicle's headlight <br />distmnce. Depending on the relative elevations of ~he I-uilrDad and ~e <br />road, ar~ also on the road's gradient, the dis~ance re~ed be~a~n the <br />railroad and TH 10 to ac21ieve a grade separation can vary from 500 to 800 <br />feet. <br /> <br />Pre~~ observations ~_~f/cate that t_he d~tances be~a~n <br />and ~H 10 are appro¥_imately 70 feet at CR S3, just over 400 feet at CR 56 <br />and just over 500 feet at (IR 57. <br /> <br />~he =hoice of location of a Wz=de-sepa_~ted ~ossLng. recf~!-es more detai!~ <br />investigation. Ir~o. _~ant aspec-.s to be Lnvestigated ar~: <br /> <br />1o ~ relati~--~p of the ~ to ~%e city's <br /> pa_~_icaiar, =h~ ex~_nt of ~~i~-y of Tine r~a/ <br /> <br />The most feasible location of M~--ssissippi Pdver crossing. It is <br />preferable ~hat ~ river crossir~ r~ate also has t~he ra~)~oad grade <br />se.raratio:-.. <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.