Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 04/09/1987

Home

out of the area ~atel¥. Mr. Wrench - Inquired as to the policy re]arding haulirg on windy days. Chaiman Peterson - Peplied that hauling on windy days would be addressed in the conditional use pemit. Mr. Shapell - Stated that he didn't believe that residents in Elk River, Sherhuzne County, were notified and that they would probehly have concerns because they would also have to look at the excavation. Chairman Peterson commented that the City of Elk River had been notified of the proposed project. Sandy Shapell - 9325 164th Lane - Inquired whether fencing would be required around the excavated areas to prevent access by children and 3- wheelers. Mr. Peck replied that Northfork would obviously have a liability for the creation of the lake; fencing may not be reasonable, but berming may be possible. The area would definitely be posted with signs. Mr. Peck also commented that the City would require slopes not to ex_oecd oertain limits. David Pavelik - 8551 156th Lane - Inquired as to the long tern effect of the lake and if it would {_ .mpact Lake Itasca. Mr. Pehbein - Peplted that the manmade lake would be separate from Lake Itasca. Mr. Peck - Oamnented that there is an overall storm water drainage plan that the City is in the process of adopting. If the -~nmade lake reaches a certain level, the overflow will drain into Lake Itasca; Lake Itasca overflow will drain south towards Hwy. 10. David Pavelik - Inquired if iow lying areas to the east would be developed. Mr. Peck - Beplied that 35 acres has ~cn deeded to the City as park land; no other develounent is proposed on the east side of Lake Itasca. Motion by Commissioner Deemer and seconded by C(munissioner Howell to adjourn the public hearing. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairman Peterson, Commissioners Deemer, The public hearing adjourned at 8:04 p.n~ Sylvia Frolik Secretary Anne Norris v/ c u ty Deve om nt Dir or P&Z Public }{earing/March 3, 1987 Page 3 of 3