My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/19/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2004
>
Minutes - Parks and Recreation Commission - 02/19/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/28/2025 11:13:55 AM
Creation date
6/25/2004 1:55:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
02/19/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Case #3: Review Commercial Trail and Park Dedication <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton advised that the City Council reviewed all fees at their December 9, <br />2003 meeting. Staff was directed to review the commercial trail and park dedication fees and <br />forward a recommendation to the Parks Commission. Information on commercial park <br />dedication fees was presented to the Parks Commission at the regular January meeting and the <br />case was tabled with a request for more detailed information. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton stated staff gathered information from cities that have recently <br />performed similar analyses and looked up data for cities that are in the northwest portion of the <br />metro area. He advised that most cities do not have a specific fee for trails; it is covered in the <br />commercial and residential park dedication fees. He presented the results of staff's research. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton reviewed that the charge from the Ramsey City Council was to review <br />commercial trail dedication fees and indirectly the commercial park dedication fees. The current <br />C/I trail fee is $100.00/acre. The current park dedication fee is 5% of Fair Market Value (FMV), <br />using $2.00/sq ft as the minimum for FMV. The current Industrial fee is also 5% FMV, using <br />$1.00/ sq ft as the minimum. Fair Market Value can be an elusive term as anyone who has <br />bought or sold real estate or vehicles can attest. The buyer always wants the value to be low and <br />the seller is looking for maximum value. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton reviewed the example contained in staff's report. He explained that the <br />basis for this analysis was the Bloomington analysis that commercial development accounts for <br />10% of park use. Commercial development can have approximately the same number of people <br />per acre as high density residential. Using 2.5 units / acre * 3 people/unit = 8 people / acre for <br />seemed like a fair basis for comparison of residential and commercial fees. This may not be an <br />exact 10% of the commercial occupants/acre but is a point for comparing the impact of the fees <br />charged. The $100/ acre commercial trail fee is 7% of the rate charged to residential land <br />whereas the Park fee is 79% of the fee for residential. The revised commercial trail fee is shown <br />at $1090/acre. This would make it 79% of the residential rate. <br /> <br />Civil Engineer II Linton suggested that changing to a fee per acre makes logical sense in that it <br />removes the ambiguity of FMV and makes the calculations straight forward. The question then <br />becomes what is a fair price for C/I park dedication fees. He presented the rates for several <br />neighboring cities as contained in the staff report. Civil Engineer II~ Linton stated staff <br />recommends adopting a fee per acre basis for calculating park dedication fees and going away <br />from the % FMV method currently in use. Staff recommends that the commercial/industrial trail <br />fee for 2004 be increased to at least $1090/acre. This would make the combined park/trail fee <br />$5446/acre. The quality of existing parks, needed improvements, and proposed improvements <br />should be evaluated, taking into consideration the new developments coming into Ramsey. <br />These proposed improvements should be evaluated in conjunction with the 5-year Capital <br />improvement program to determine if the current park and dedication fee structure will provide <br />the necessary funds to build the future park improvements. <br /> <br />Park and Recreation Commission/February 19, 2004 <br /> Page 4 of 7 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.