Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />E. Provides for certification by engineer. <br /> <br />F, Provides assurances. <br /> <br />Commis.sioner Sieber pointed out that the contract refers to the City of P~sey <br />as kming the airport o~.~er and that the second paragraph on page 1 implies <br />iml,rovemcr~ts are intended to be made at Gateway North, which is not the case~ <br />this study is to detez~,ine whether or not upgrading Gateway North is feasible. <br /> <br />Co~c~ission consensus is to replace all references in the contract to <br />with ' Sl~onsor' <br /> <br />Commission consensus is to reword the first line of the second paragraph on <br />page 1 as follows: '%Nereas, the pl~onsor .pro_poses to make Lmprovements . . .'. <br /> <br />Mr. Koshak noted the following corrections in the last paragraph on page 1: <br /> <br />a. ~-~ird Line - Change 'lump sum payment' to 'lump sum cost' <br /> <br /> · ' ' S n ' <br />b Fourth Line - Change $35,300 to '.36,8u0 <br /> <br />c. Sixth Line - Change $5,100' to '$3,600' <br /> <br />Mr. Otto referred to Page 2, second paragraph and noted that Mn/DoT does not <br />want to deal with numerous reimbursement requests from the City; Mn/Dot is <br />agreeable to 4 or 5 reimbursement requests from the City for the entire <br />project. <br /> <br />Commissioner Siebert inquired if there were any provisions in the contract <br />for payment holdback. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto and Mr. Koshak replied that there are not any such provisions; the <br />work must be done in conformance with the work statement and payment is <br />required for work done to date. <br /> <br />Mr. Otto referred to Page 3, third paragraph, and suggested wording be <br />included to the effect that Approval of Phase I be obtained prior to <br />entering Phase II. The Commission agreed. <br /> <br />Commission consensus is to make the following change to the third paragraph <br />fifth line, Page 3: 'to proceed has been given in writing by the sponsor and <br />by' <br /> <br />Commission consensus is to make the following change to the last paragraph <br />on Page 4: Delete all wording after the phrase 'and other similar items'. <br /> <br />Chairman Ippel referred to the sign-off page and requested that Mr. Koshak <br />determine whether or not it will be necessary for the entire Council to <br />sign the contract. <br /> <br />The Commission then reviewed Exhibit A of the contract. <br /> <br />No major comments were made by the Commission other than that Item 2.F <br />refers to a survey of active pilots in the area and Commissioner Soderholm <br />volunteered to compiling such a list. <br /> <br />Sp AP/January 25, 1984 <br /> Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />