06/03/04 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Johnson, Jeffrey, Shepherd, Van Scoy, and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Brauer. Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Board Member Johnson to adopt Resolution #04-06- 139 adopting Findings of Facts #0677 favorable to the applicant relating to Fred and Rose Kalk's request for a variance from lot width requirements. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Johnson, Jeffrey, Shepherd, Van Scoy, and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Brauer. Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Board Member Johnson to approve Fred and Rose Kal k's request for a variance from lot width requirement based on the Findings of Fact and adopt Resolution #04-06-140 declaring terms of same. Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Board Members Johnson, Jeffrey, Shepherd, Van Scoy, and Watson. Voting No: None. Absent: Board Member Brauer. Case #2 Request for a Variance from Street Frontage or Lot Width Requirements; Case of Kelly and Carrie Hemp Presentation Associate Planner Geisler advised Kelly and Carrie Hemp are requesting a variance to the minimum lot width or street frontage requirement so that a dwelling may be constructed on a lot that does not have any public road frontage. She indicated the Hemps received a variance to construct a house on the lot on September 10, 2001 and an extension to the variance on December 5, 2002, which expired on September 10, 2003. She stated the Hemps have reapplied for the variance as they are now ready to construct the house. She advised the property is located on the south side of County Road #64. Associate Planner Geisler stated the parcel is approximately 21.20 acres in size and is zoned R-1 Rural Developing. She added the surrounding parcels are also zoned R-1 Rural Developing. She indicated the Hemp's parcel is served by a 66' wide access easement from County Road #64, and does not have any direct access to a public road. She stated in the R-I Rural Developing District, the minimum lot width or street frontage requirement is 200 feet. Therefore, even though the Hemp's parcel is an existing lot, a home cannot be constructed on the property without a variance. She stated the applicant will need to provide a copy of the shared access agreement between the two parties. Associate Planner Geisler stated the same underlying facts remain as when the variance was approved in 2001 and 2002. She also noted there is a typo in the zoning - it is listed as Rural Developing, but should be Rural Reserve. Board of Adjustment/June 3, 2004 Page 3 of 5