Agenda - Council - 09/10/1984 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

I I I i I are searching for defendants, it would be likely, because R~msey has a contract interest and receiving proceeds from the operation, I that Ramsey would be n~med as having a Joint venture with Anoka. It islikely that the lawsuit would not be ultimately successful but it would be expensive for Kamsey to defend themselves. Conditional use permit and contract affords R-msey some additional protection because the permit and contract indemnify for damages that would be awarded by courts, but allows operator to take on the responsibility of attorney fees. Commissioner Hendriksen referred to Waste Management's letter dated Juny 3, 1984, point #2 - Inquired who determines remedial action is required? Mr. LeFevere - It would not be determined by Ramsey Council or citizens; it would have to be remedial action ordered by State or Federal agencies or courts. i I I I I I I ! i i I I Commissioner Hendriksen referred to discussions regarding Waste Management of Minnesota and their solvency and inquired as to just what their assets are. Mr. LeFevere - The reason for wanting a guarantee from the parent corporation was to assure protection will extend out into the future in the event Waste Management of Minnesota is not solvent. Jim O'Connor - Vice President and District Manager for Waste Management, Inc. - Stated that Waste Management of Minnesota is the holding company for this sanitary landfill; recently acquired a company in the City of Blaine; holding company for other acquisitions made in the State. Financial statements are audited on an annual basis and are a matter of public record. Chairman Peterson stated that it is not his intention to take final action this evening; an issue of this magnitude needs to be looked into a great deal. Chairman Peterson stated he will enteratin a motion to table action until Planning Commission's regular meeting in August. Chairman Peterson stated that the Commission has received new information this evening and will continue to take written input from citizens until July 24, 1984 at 5:00 p.m. At that time the City Staff and City Attorney will be combining discussions into facts that the Planning Commission can base their decision on. Mr. Don Otter - Agreed with Chairman Peterson's statements. Chairman Peterson stated that because of personal involvement in this issue and rumors heard during the June 25, 1984 public hearing, he will be abstaining from any voting in this matter. Chairman Peterson also noted that the change in location of the June 25, 1984 public hearing was not an attempt to trick or hide any proceedings; there was a change in location after the City realized that attendance would be far greater than anticipated. P & Z/July 5~, 1984 Page 6 of 19