Laserfiche WebLink
Case #1: Vehicle Towing Contract For City Of Ramsey: <br /> <br />Mr. Cleremont of Taylor's Towing was present and if the City puts out bids <br />for towing service and what are the requirements of the bidding.. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Chief of Police Auspos replied that the City has never been asked to go on <br />a bid basis but he did draft some requirements to be used should Council <br />decide to go for towing service on a bid basis. <br /> <br />Judy RDhle - 17100 Bison Street - Representing North Star Towing - Stated <br />North Star has been towing for Ramsey for 4% years and added that she <br />prefers not to enter into a contract as they are too binding and free <br />enterprise allows for the best service. <br /> <br />Council consensus is that as long as the current service is satisfactory, <br />the City can seen no reason to open towing service to bids at this time. <br /> <br />Case ~3: Request For Vacating Of Drainage Easement On Lot 12f Block 4~ <br /> Oakridge Estates; Case Of F.H. Enterprises: <br /> <br />City Engineer Raatikka stated that this drainage easement was drawn in <br />without considering the high land on the lot, without following the contours <br />of the land and considering that this high land will never flood. Mr. Raatikka <br />stated that a drainage easement here is not doing the City any good. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Reimann and seconded by ODuncilmember Sorteberg to <br />adopt Resolution #84-76 correcting drainage easement on Lot 12, Block 4, <br />Oakridge Estates. (Please refer to resolution file for P~solution #84~76). <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Oouncilmembers Sorteberg, Reimann, <br />Schlueter and Van Wagner. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Case #4: Cable T.V. Regardin~ Rates: <br /> <br />Council took no action on this case as the City has not yet received any <br />material from Mr. Creighton. <br /> <br />Case #6: Request To Subdivide B~ Mstes And Bounds; Case Of Mr. %~%omas Holker: <br /> <br />Mr. Schnelle stated that Mr. Holker is requesting authorization to subdivide <br />by metes and bounds a 13 acre parcel which is located on Sunfish Lake Blvd. <br />NW just south of County Road #5. Mr. Schnelle stated that Ramsey~s <br />Comprehensive Plan limits development to 1 unit/10 acres and Mr. Holker <br />already has one unit on the parcel. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka informed~r. Holker that the Comprehensive Plan was adopted in <br />March of 1982. <br /> <br />I <br />i <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />Mr. Holker stated that in July or August of 1983 the Planning Commission <br />approved a lot split as shown on the survey and since then he has entered <br />into two separate purchase agreements thinking the subdivision would pass <br />right through. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich stated that the Planning Commission Only advises <br />Council. Mr. Goodrich stated that Mr. Holker could request a zoning <br />amendment and approach Planning and Zoning with it. <br /> <br />Mr. Holker stated if this change messes up two more sales for him, he will <br />see the City in court. <br /> <br />C/April 24, 1984 <br /> Page 15 of 20 <br /> <br /> <br />