Laserfiche WebLink
?a~e 2 <br /> <br />There was some discussion with Mr. Carson and the plumber as to how so <br />much sand could be present in a service line. I told them that until <br />the nature and location of the lines' fault was ascertained, <br />connecture was valueless. However, when the city's mains and services <br />were installed, they were clean, tight and carefully tested to assure <br />their integrity. <br /> <br />The following day, Wednesday, December 11, 1985, Roto Rooter's sewer <br />jet crew arrived at 9:00 a.m. and attempted to clear the service line. <br />They had little success. Approximately six feet into the exposed <br />pipe, a gap was encountered which sucked in about 20 feet of jet hose. <br />At that point, it was decided that the project's utility contractor <br />(Arcon Construction, Mora, Minnesota) should be called to make the <br />repairs. Since they have equipment large enough to handle the frost <br />and high groundwater conditions. Also, they had previously requested <br />that if repairs were necessary to a line which they installed, that <br />they be allowed to fix it. <br /> <br />I called John Grace, project foreman with Arcon, and told him to line <br />up the necessary crew and equipment. He said they would be in first <br />thing tomorrow. <br /> <br />I also explained to Mr. Carson that if the'fault in the line is not <br />due to a problem with Arcon's work, he would probably be billed for <br />their time and materials. <br /> <br />A Cat 255 backhoe was delivered to the site by Arcon in the afternoon. <br />The plumber covered the area with hay and planks to prevent freezing <br />and make the area safer. <br /> <br />On Thursday, December 12, 1985, Arcon's crew arrived on-site at about <br />7:30 a.m. and proceeded to dig up the service riser. In the process <br />about one-third of the driveway had to be removed so that the large <br />backhoe could work. <br /> <br />Upon uncovering the service riser a 10" gap was discovered between the <br />service and the riser pipe. The service elevation was checked at this <br />time in case the service itself had settled. End of service elevation <br />was found to be 851.0. The service had been staked to an elevation of <br />850.9 at the time of construction. Services are ordinarily installed <br />slightly (0.1' to 0.2' above the staked elevation to compensate for <br />possible settlement. <br /> <br />This information was given to both Mr. Carson and the plumber. They <br />both, at the time, accepted the theory that the riser was probably <br />pulled off at the time the house was connected to the riser. <br /> <br /> <br />