Laserfiche WebLink
Ms. Anne Norris <br />Page Two <br />January 10, 1986 <br /> <br />with soil test results and appropriate ground water measurements that the indi- <br />vidual on-site treatment systems can feasibly be constructed and will not <br />cause a ground water contamination problem. For the proposed commercial deve- <br />lopment, a high rate soil absorbtion system evaluation should be conducted. <br />The EIS should also contain a discussion about alternate methods of wastewater <br />treatment and disposal since item 16 in the scoping EAW and in attachment A <br />indicates that the project area contains steep slopes with highly erodible soils <br />which are not suitable for on-site septic tank drainfields. Please contact <br />Larry Zdon of the Division of Water Quality's Technical Review Unit at 296-7214 <br />to set up a meeting to discuss what specific information is needed for the EIS <br />with regard to wastewater treatment. . <br /> <br />The EIS should also contain a discussion about project related stormwater. With <br />regard to surface water quality, both the City and the project proposer are <br />urged to pursue reasonable design features to maximize the detention and <br />infiltration of runoff waters from the site. For example, drainage from parking <br />areas, and other impervious surfaces should be routed over grassy or landscaped <br />areas prior to collection to create opportunities for treatment and disposal of <br />stormwater by overland flow. Such measures would limit increased hydraulic or <br />pollutant loading associated with the additional stormwater runoff from the <br />site. <br /> <br />Air .qu. al ity, Traffic and Noise <br /> <br />With regard to air quality, an indirect source permit (ISP} is required for the <br />project and should have been listed under Item ll of the scoping EAW. Minnesota <br />Rules Chapter 7001.1250 - 7001.1350 require an ISP for certain projects that <br />involve the construction of more than 1,DO0 parking spaces. We recommend that <br />the necessary traffic, air quality and noise information required for the ISP <br />for the project be developed concurrently with EIS preparation and that modeling <br />results be contained in the EIS. Please contact Susanne Pelly of the Division <br />of Air Quality at (612) 296-7723 regarding information required for the ISP <br />including background carbon monoxide default values to be used for the air <br />quality analysis. The EIS should contain a discussion about access of project <br />traffic onto local trunk highways, including Trunk Highway 10/169 which is <br />located to the south of the project site. <br /> <br />The staff is also concerned that noise levels due to traffic on Trunk Highway <br />10/169 may exceed state noise standards. Minnesota Rules Chapter 7010 require <br />that a daytime LIO level of 65 dBA and a nighttime LIO level of 55 dBA for land <br />use category NAC-1 at the proposed residential units or a daytime and nighttime <br />LiO of 70 dBA at the proposed commercial development, not be exceeded. The staff <br />recommends that noise levels from nearby roadways be evaluated in the EIS to <br />determine if the state noise standards will be exceeded. The total average <br />daily traffic derived from existing traffic and traffic from the proposed devel- <br />opment should be used for this assessment. <br /> <br />If the state noise standards are to be exceeded due to traffic on this roadway, <br />the City should ensure that the proposer implements noise control measures to <br />come into compliance with the state standards. For example, possible noise <br /> <br /> <br />