My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 05/27/1986
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
1986
>
Agenda - Council - 05/27/1986
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/15/2025 8:29:08 AM
Creation date
7/15/2004 11:11:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/27/1986
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
318
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mayor Heitman stated that based upon information he has received from Hr. <br />Hartley, this special meet£ng was called at the request of Councilmember <br />Sorteberg and Mr. Hartley. I~ayor Heitman stated that he agreed to call the <br />special Council meeting based on Councilmember Sorteberg'a concern; <br />Councilmember Sorteberg being 50I of the Personnel Coe~ittee. Mayor ~eitman <br />noted that two days prior to calling for this meeting, he was approached with a <br />request for a special Council meeting for another reason and refused that <br />request, <br /> <br />COUNCIL BUSINESS <br /> <br />Discussion Re~ardin~ Hr. Wirz' Reauest For Back Pay For 15I <br /> Salary Increase As Comnensation For Assumin~ Duties Of Buildin~ <br /> <br />Councilme~ber Sorteberg stated that the April 29, 1984 recommendation of the <br />Personnel Committee vas to pay Mr. Wirz 151 above base salary for assuming <br />duties of Building Department. Mr. Hartley and Hr. Craczyk determined that the <br />action should be accomplished by a Council motion based on the fact that <br />earlier action regarding this issue was rescinded by motion. Councilmember <br />Sorteberg stated that Mr. ~irz is concerned with the issue not being resolved <br />in five months and receivin§ no back pay. Councilmember Sorteberg stated that <br />the issue of tonight's Council meeting may be considered unimportant by some <br />people but Council has conducted special meetings for less important issues. <br />Mr. Wirz was hoping that the issue would be acted on at the Council meeting <br />usually held the second Tuesday of the month. <br /> <br />Mayor Heitman stated that he did not call a meeting for the second Tuesday in <br />Nay. <br /> <br />Notion by Councilmember Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmember Schlueter to <br />compensate Hr. Wirz at a rate of 151 above base salary for assuming the <br />responsibilities of the Building Department from October 1, 1985 to December <br />31 , 1 985 · <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Payor Heitman stated the previous action to provide this <br />compensation was halted so as not to jeopardize labor negotiation discussions; <br />viii this reinstatement of action create similar problems. Hr. Goodrich <br />replied that the labor contract has been approved by both the union and the <br />City Council; dou*t see this request for compensation being an issue any longer <br />as far as labor negotiations are concerned and it should not create additional <br />problems with respect to the union. Mayor Beitman inquired as to how the back <br />pay viii be applied. Finance Officer Graczyk explained that there is a <br />procedure and form to be followed for back pay situations. Mr. Graczyk stated <br />that the actual hours worked during the subject time period are reviewed; those <br />hours are multiplied by the additional money approved. Mr. Craczyk stated that <br />the estimated hours worked by Mr. ~irz from October I to December 20, 1985 are <br />472, amounting to an approximate back pay amount of ~980.00. Mr. Craczyk <br />stated that if there were overtime hours worked and paid, those hours would <br />also be included and paid at the higher rate; if the employee vas given comp <br />time for that overtime, the higher rate is not paid for those overtime hours. <br />Mayor Heitman stated that he would like to know the following items for the <br />subject time period for Mr. Wirz: how many base hours worked, how many <br /> <br />Page 2 of 3 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.