My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 07/27/2004
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2004
>
Minutes - Council - 07/27/2004
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/24/2025 2:51:05 PM
Creation date
7/21/2004 8:34:37 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
07/27/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The meeting was recessed at 8:55 p.m. and reopened at 9:05 p.m. <br /> <br />Case #9: Acquisition of 14140 Azurite St NW <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained staff has been directed by the EDA to facilitate development <br />and redevelopment activity and to acquire properties in the City's Development District No. 1 as <br />willing sellers put their properties on the market. Staff has obtained an appraisal and an <br />environlnental assessment of the property and has presented an offer of $169,900 for the property <br />contingent on City Council approval. The acquisition of this property would be funded through <br />TIF District No. 2 with the possibility of receiving additional funding from the EDA. Staff feels <br />that the acquisition of this property is consistent with the development program of TIF District <br />No. 2 and will promote quality development on the site. Staff has advised the owner of possible <br />relocation qualification and benefits. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig questioned why the relocation procedure is required in this case, as it is a <br />straight-out purchase. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich explained relocation benefits relate to eminent domain, however, the law <br />states that any time a municipal government acquires property there could be relocation benefits <br />available. Staff does not foresee this as an issue, however, by law the City is required to give the <br />information to the property owner and they can seek out whatever counsel they would like. <br /> <br />Counci hnember Pearson asked who determines the amount of the relocation benefits. <br /> <br />City Attorney Goodrich replied the specified amount is determined by federal law, with amounts <br />based on moving expenses and relocation, <br /> <br />Motion by Councihnember Kurak, seconded by Councilmember Pearson, to enter into the <br />purchase agreement to purchase 14140 Azurite Street NW. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Gamec, Councilmembers Kurak, Pearson, Cook, Elvig, <br />Strommcn, and Zimmerman. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Case #10: <br /> <br />Request for Amendment to an Approved Site Plan; Case of Paddock <br />Investments <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Trudgeon reviewed that on September 23, 2003, <br />Paddock Investments received site plan approval for a 10,976 manufacturing facility on the <br />property located on Azurite Street south of Sunwood Drive. Paddock Investments is now ready <br />to install thc landscaping on their site, and is seeking an amendment to the landscaping plan <br />approved by the City Council. Several commercial and industrial site plans were approved by <br />the City Council in 2003, which were reviewed and approved under the then-new Commercial <br />and Industrial Zoning Requirements. It quickly became apparent that the shrub requirements in <br />the new code were excessive and would be difficult to apply in new developments. On several of <br />these site plans, staff received direction to negotiate a more reasonable shrub requirement with <br /> <br />City Council/July 27, 2004 <br />Page 21 of 35 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.