Laserfiche WebLink
Further Discuss]on: Mayor Be]b, an inquired how Ms. Skarbakka's Presence or non- <br />presence will change what Mr. Ooodric~ recommended as the appropriate <br />procedure. Councilmember Cox replied that it doesn't b~t he does have so~e <br />questions he would like angered by the applicant. Mayor Heitman inquired if <br />there was sc~eone present in the audience representing Ms. Skarbakka and there <br />was no reply. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Councilm~nbers Sorteberg, Schlueter, Reimann and <br />Cox. Voting No: Mayor Heitman. <br /> <br />Mayor lteitman directed City Staff to place Ms. Skarbakka's request on the next <br />Council agenda; to request that Ms. Skarbakka or her representative be present <br />at that meeting; and to inform Ms. Skarbakka that the case will not be tabled <br />again based on her non-presenoe. <br /> <br />Be <br /> <br />Jeff Calve, surveyor, and Mr. Dale Voltin were present. <br /> <br />Councilmember Cox stated that Voltin's Oak Hill Estates is a situation where a <br />plat is being developed at the expense of a Previous plat (Menkveld's Country <br />Park) because the roads are constructed and psid for. Counciln~r COx <br />expressed serious oonoern with the fact that there is only one access serving <br />Menkveld's Country Park and Voltin's Oak Hill Estates <br /> <br />Mr. Caine stated that Mr. Voltin will deed a road easement to the east for <br />future access. Mr. Caine also noted that a road looping through the <br />development would provide additional accesses and more p~rcels but the <br />developer has chosen not to go that route. <br /> <br />Mr. Raatikka stated that street and ditch profiles have not been provided. <br />Additional soil borings have deten~ined that Lot 4 is adequate for an on-site <br />septic system. <br /> <br />Mr. Caine stated that the profiles will be ~x, plete in a couple of days. <br /> <br />Councilm~nber Cox recommended that a road easement between Lots 3 and 4 be <br />provided to the south in case of future develounent. <br /> <br />Mr. Voltin stated that because of the cost to build a road over the drainage <br />ditch, he doubts the property to the south will ever be developed. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Sorteberg and seconded by Councilmember Reimarm to <br />approve Mr. Voltin's request for preliminary plat approval of Voltin's Oak Hill <br />Estates with a varianoe for cul-de-sac length and contingent upon Mr. Voltin <br />complying with the terms of the City Engineer's report dated January 30, 1986 <br />including the provision of a 66 foot wide utility easement along the north edge <br />of Lot 4. Further, that development of LOt 4 will not take place until a <br />southerly access is estnhlis~ed; subdivision of Lots 1, 2 and 3 will not be <br />made until an additional access has been established. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Beitman, Councilmembers Sorteberg, COx, <br /> February 25, 1986 <br /> <br />Page 13 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />