Laserfiche WebLink
I <br /> I <br /> ! <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> i <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br /> I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />-5- <br /> <br />Tr~ me tro~li tan area'.s technolc~y-inter~ive irtlustry ~s a ~orerunner of t~e <br />e~er~ir~ information-based eooncmy. Y~ch Of this industry is <br />Its anteoedents are the area'.s entrepreneurs of expansionary vision who <br />prospered from the fortunate, if not f(xtuitcus, juxtaposition of high finance, <br />high eduGation and high perfonnar~e of wc~k f~rce--a].l sharpenirg the cuttir~ <br />edge of private and public ent~prise. <br /> <br />It is this past that now can help shape this area~s future in a yet emerging <br />information society. It is not yet clear h~w the lmblic sector should direct <br />its resources. For example, what is the relative importar~e of providir~ <br />dollars for education, fc~ street maintenar~e, or for real estate develoi~ent? <br />Fax-sighted ar~ prudent deployment of always scarce public resources is an <br />over-ridirg concern in estahlishirg the role of cities as active participsnts <br />in buildin9 the urban-industrial environment. <br /> <br />City 9overnments are significant agents for maintainir~ th~ strer~th of the <br />nation'.s urban areas. But how they carry out this task is in~ensely <br />controversial today, particularly as city governments in the last 10 years have <br />begun to play more aggressive roles than ever before in becc~irg finar~ially <br />in~lv~d with real estate develc~ment within their i~rders. The national and <br />state gove~,~nts are the centers of the debate, because they have been the <br />main sources of financing available to cities. <br /> <br />In Mir~esota, the Legislature has begun to ask fundamental questions as the <br />dollar investment has risen rapidly: (a) ~at is the purpose of this <br />assistar~e? (b) Hsw much is beirg provided? (c) l~w prudently are the dollars <br />beir~3 spent? (d) Are the results worth the effort? (e) ~hat negative results, <br />if any, are evident? (f) Il) cities need moz~ ___mc~e_ y? (9) Who is accx)un~able <br />for the way the money is beirg spent? (h) ~hat is the '.'opportunity oost': of <br />real estate assistance? ~hat is, what public or private service investment is <br />not l~rovided or sit, ported becsnse of the real estate expenditure? (i) If <br />cities were not to spend t]~ mo~ey, h~w wculd it be sisent in the private <br />sector? (j) What is ~ social oost to taxpayers in sustaining the existing <br />role of cities in real estate develcpment? ~hat is the social cost to <br />taxl~yers in abar~ng that role? ~]%is report is intended to help public <br />officials think through tl~se questions. <br /> <br /> <br />