Laserfiche WebLink
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />! <br />i <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />acce~ry str~cture size ordinance and initiate the neoessary et. eps to <br />LTple~en~ those ~rodifioations. <br /> <br />Further Discussion: Com¢il~ber Schlueter stated that at & ~xevious meeting <br />she made it known to Mr. Johnson that she made a mistake in the voting; that <br />she wanted the matter cleared up that night but the Mayor took that opportunity <br />a~ay fr~ her by tabling the case. (Duncilm~rber Schlueter also noted that <br />Oouncil unanimously denied Mr. Ness; pres~re that this motion does not include <br />reversing the action in Mr. Ness' case. Mayor Heitman stated that his motion <br />is on the praise that in order to get to a new and clean baseline, he will <br />against his original thoughts. Mayor Hei~an stated that his ultimate goal <br />to get out of the process of p~h~_ic hearings on rsguests for variances to <br />structure size; the ordinance states the size limits, City Staff can enforoe <br />that ordinance at the City }~%11 ~ounter and citizens can save thyselves $90. <br />Go~cilm~ber Schlueter stated that ~he will not give a blanket ap[x(wal to the <br />board of adjustment varianoes that were tabled. (D~cilme~ber (Dx stated that <br />he disagrees with the Attorney's opinion; the ordinance was adopted with the <br />intent that people have the right to go beyond the City Staff level and <br />before the elected officials with their request; it appears that we are trying <br />to take that right away. (Duncil~ber Sorteberg suggested an adjustment to <br />the square footage all~ed could alleviate the ~d for board of adjustment <br />public hearings and meetings. (buncilm~ber Sorteberg stated that (Duncil <br />should meet with Planning and Zoning on October 1 and resolve the ordinance and <br />tabled r~guests for variance issues at the October 8 (buncil ~eeting; also not <br />in favor of a blanket decision. O~uncil~ber Reimann stated that he is not in <br />favor of a blanket decision. O)uncilm~ber (Dx stated that another concern is <br />that people understand that the $90 board of adjustment fee does not guarantee <br />an approval to the request. <br /> <br />Motion failed. Votirg Yes: None. Voting No: Mayor Heitwan, G~uncil~bers <br />Sorteberg, (Dx, Reimann and Schlueter. <br /> <br />Motion by Oouncilm~rber Sorteberg and seoonded by Gouncil~rber Schlueter to <br />schedule a special Oo~cil meeting for 6:30 p.m. on October 1 to meet with <br />Planning and Zoning regarding the acoessory structure size ordinanoe; further, <br />that Oouncil take action on the ordinance and the tabled requests for variances <br />at the special (Duncil ~eeting scheduled for October 8. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heitman, GouncilmsPbers Sorteberg, (Dx, <br />Reimann and Sc~lueter. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />QOUNCIL Nf~ BUSINESS <br /> <br />Rec~tion Fro~ Econ~ric Develo_~ent Ore, fission Regarding <br /> Anoka Oounty And A~oka Area Chambers of (kmrerce: <br /> <br />Mr. Tc~ Snell of the Anoka (Dunty Charber of Omm~rce was present and stated <br />that Ramsey's EDC Cx~.rission has agreed the Anoka Got~aty and Anoka Area <br />Ch~Pbers should share representation of R~rsey. <br /> <br />Mr. byle McLaughlin, 1984 ~aoka Gounty (~arber cf Om~erce President, stated <br />that the (Dunty Ch~rber is more regional in soope and will address <br />transportation, fiscal disparity and total eoor~ric ~evelol~Pent. <br /> Sept~rber 24, 1985 <br /> <br />Page 13 of 21 <br /> <br /> <br />